- Local time
- 9:32 PM
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2010
- Messages
- 38,487
- Reaction score
- 153,301
- Location
- Monroe, New York
If the car runs smooth the math is right - if it doesn't........
![]()
Gentlemen,
Mopar 3B is correct, the formula cannot be solved unless a few known dimensions are given. Using Mathcad or some other problem solving method, the formula can be solved simultanesously, that is one variable solved by expressing it interms of the other, then substituting some known dimensions, produce the results wanted/expected. How ever the last pix shows the result of the yield point of the rod material being exceeded....sort of looks like a SB Chevy that exceeded 9000+ RPMs....the section width (section modulus) of the rod looks too narrow to be a Mopar rod. BTW...the off set piston pin dimensions only affect the piston's trust face loads not the load imposed on the rod.
Cheers,
RJ Renton
That would make a great lamp!Fixed.
Gentlemen,
Mopar 3B is correct, the formula cannot be solved unless a few known dimensions are given. BTW...the off set piston pin dimensions only affect the piston's trust face loads not the load imposed on the rod.
Cheers,
RJ Renton
The diagram and equation are for the load straight down through the crown or "thrust face" as you put it, when did we start talking about rod loading? Besides that, the pin offset definitely affects both. Do a load force diagram, derive the equation, and you'll see what I mean.the off set piston pin dimensions only affect the piston's trust face loads not the load imposed on the rod
The diagram and equation are for the load straight down through the crown or "thrust face" as you put it, when did we start talking about rod loading? Besides that, the pin offset definitely affects both. Do a load force diagram, derive the equation, and you'll see what I mean.