• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

SRT6 Crossfire with a wing.

SteveSS

Well-Known Member
Local time
3:44 PM
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
5,912
Reaction score
9,437
Location
Colorado Springs
I've always kind of liked Crossfires, even with Top Gear's dog pooping joke. I like it better with the wing. Looks Porscherist. This was in a Hagerty article on spoilers.



crossfire.jpg
 
I considered getting one, but I'm to big and fat to fit in one. they are small inside.
BMW Z3 has alot more room.
I'm told the Crossfire is based off the Mercedes-Benz SLK
 
When I was at Chrysler, I got to see, drive and take home cars that first showed up at the plant as drive outs for the plant manager before they hit the general public. The list went on and a few I remembered being fun and that was one of them. People that hate on them should have tried that Chrysler TC by Maserati built on a shortened second-generation K car platform. That car was an embarrassment. The Chrysler Crossfire was basically a Mercedes built on the platform of the Mercedes-Benz SLK320. The SRT was even a bigger blast to drive. Another fun one, for the times, was the Conquest.
 
When I was at Chrysler, I got to see, drive and take home cars that first showed up at the plant as drive outs for the plant manager before they hit the general public. The list went on and a few I remembered being fun and that was one of them. People that hate on them should have tried that Chrysler TC by Maserati built on a shortened second-generation K car platform. That car was an embarrassment. The Chrysler Crossfire was basically a Mercedes built on the platform of the Mercedes-Benz SLK320. The SRT was even a bigger blast to drive. Another fun one, for the times, was the Conquest.
When we were on our last big trip, I gentleman came up to me and started asking about my Satellite. He was a plant manager in St Louis. He was a great guy and would have enjoyed talking to him longer, but we had a schedule to keep.
 
When we were on our last big trip, I gentleman came up to me and started asking about my Satellite. He was a plant manager in St Louis. He was a great guy and would have enjoyed talking to him longer, but we had a schedule to keep.
We had a hand full of different plant managers over the years. Some would show up to cut money and then leave. Then the good guy would show up and give a little something. One of my jobs was to crate and uncrate their stuff when they came and left.
 
Another fun one, for the times, was the Conquest.

I saw a very nice one just yesterday! The guy made a hard turn onto SR-21 at full throttle and was rowing the gears quite nicely.
 
I saw a very nice one just yesterday! The guy made a hard turn onto SR-21 at full throttle and was rowing the gears quite nicely.
The plant manager had one just like this, this is not his. He had it a few months and I used it several times on the weekends. For it's time, it was a bunch of fun. First Challengers, 300 SRT's. I don't know what happened to these evaluation cars, but I will say, they got the snot driven out of them. Drive it like you stole it! LOL.... I used a few minivans for vacations, over 3 thousand miles on one.
1762091847419.png
 
I am a gearhead so no vehicle is wthout some merits, well almost no vehicle lol. The dog poop joke I never agreed with as this car is essentially a porsche body with cosmeti differences on the tail light and front clip, but the general shape of it is similar.
I did not know it originated from Top Gear, which makes sense as to why I disagree with it. If the exact same car had a TVR badge on it they would have slobbered themselves and named it car of the year and discussed it in every episode.

That said, I put this car in the Miata/Z3/SLK/Boxster category. A small coupe with some zip thta was designed to be ore of what purists would call a traditional sports car. More so on that line than an American type muscle/sports car. These types of small coupes are generally designed where the powertrain could never hope to out-power the capability of the chassis. It makes for spirited driving on winding roads, hard corners, and the ability to push the car very hard, even if it is not setting speed records.

Sometimes driving a slower car really hard can be more fun then driving a really fast car slow.

Like most of these types, there are ways to flip the ratio of power to handling in favor of power. Or make it closer anyway. Personally, I do not have funds to throw at things willy nilly or i would probably pick one of these up because they tend to be affordable and smiles per $$ is high, plus I like hot rodding things and there are plenty of things to do to these.

It is important to be honest on these cars though, besides some nameplates and the design of a few body panels, there is nothing Chrysler about this car. That doesn't make it worse, it is just how it is. I would still buy one with someone else's money lol.
 
Last edited:
The plant manager had one just like this, this is not his. He had it a few months and I used it several times on the weekends. For it's time, it was a bunch of fun. First Challengers, 300 SRT's. I don't know what happened to these evaluation cars, but I will say, they got the snot driven out of them. Drive it like you stole it! LOL.... I used a few minivans for vacations, over 3 thousand miles on one.
View attachment 1941342
Mitsubishi Starion. Probably the most 1980's car ever made, if you exclude exotics. Turbo 4, but actually a pretty hefty 4 so it had some grunt on it's own, relatively of course. The dashboard is like the definition of 1980's.
Reasonable condition examples(rust wise) are getting harder to find.
Reasonable condition examples that have not been riced out by fast and furious millenials(read: interior ripped apart, suspension F'd with but not actually finished, engine pulled and taken apart in a pile) are getting exceedingly rare. Plus there is a segment of dopes "I am going to LS swap it" even though it requires like a 6" cowl hood, where they sit a 5.3 in there without bolting it down to make it look like they accomplished anything when in truth all the fab work needs to be completed and the car is a roller that they hacked up and lost the drivetrain.
Anyway, that is my rant I guess on little kid hack jobs of otherwise fun cars for the day LOL. These cars are much higher on my list as I like certain Japanese cars from the era.
 
When I was at Chrysler, I got to see, drive and take home cars that first showed up at the plant as drive outs for the plant manager before they hit the general public. The list went on and a few I remembered being fun and that was one of them. People that hate on them should have tried that Chrysler TC by Maserati built on a shortened second-generation K car platform. That car was an embarrassment. The Chrysler Crossfire was basically a Mercedes built on the platform of the Mercedes-Benz SLK320. The SRT was even a bigger blast to drive. Another fun one, for the times, was the Conquest.
And I don't recall anyone saying bad things about the Crossfire.....thing is, the body style doesn't do much for me but the having the wing helps it look better for sure.
 
It is important to be honest on these cars though, besides some nameplates and the design of a few body panels, there is nothing Chrysler about this car. That doesn't make it worse, it is just how it is. I would still buy one with someone else's money lol.
My D50 was never a Chrysler either, I get it, you're right.
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top