• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Keisler mistake

wirenut

Active Member
Local time
3:56 PM
Joined
Oct 29, 2009
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
Location
ct
In sept. of 08 I priced a A-41 auto overdrive kit from Keisler after reading about it in Mopar action. I clicked on the picture of my car, 65 Plymouth Bel 2, and filled out the requested info. They e-mailed me a detailed plain english PDF quote with line item desciptions for a "complete bolt in and go kit". I felt the price was more than having an overdrive was worth to me and e- mailed the salesman asking if he could do better. The answer was no that this was a great deal (3800). Some time in dec of o8 I received an e-mail from them regarding a sale. I checked it out and it was for the kit I priced. The price had been reduced to 3200 and change. I e-mailed the previous PDF quote back to the salesman and asked if he could now sell it for 3000. He replied no. I asked why not and referred him to the current sale. He replied that he wasn't even aware they were having such a sale and he could do it for 3170. I told him that would be great lets move forward, and I give him my CC info, and he forwards a reciept with line items that are nothing but part #s. I did'nt give it much thought, I buy alot of materials through my company and sometimes estimate and invoices don't use the same language. A month or so passes and and the kit arrives. The box is kinda small and there isn't anyway there could be a drive shaft in it. So before I open anything I call the salesman and say whats up with the drive shaft. He says the drive shaft gets shipped later, but it dosn't matter because the kit I bought was a down graded kit. I ask him what the hell is a down graded kit, and what good is any of this with out a drive shaft. He tells me if I don,t like it just return it. I tell him fine send a shipping tag, he says if i want to return it I have to pay for shipping and a re-stocking fee, or he can "give" me a drive shaft for 325 plus shipping. I tell him in plain language how much this upsets me and he tells me call customer service.
I call customer service and get voice mail. After several attemps I get some woman that explains that customer service is also covering for the tech guy and he's very busy. He calls me back a day or so later and tells me he's already spoken with the salesman and they best they can do is "give me the driveshaft for 200 plus shipping. I tell him this is unacceptable and I want it for nothing. He then asks if I understand that there also is no crossmember. I tell him no. I have not opened the box. He said it dosn't much matter they don't make one anyway! He says he will have to discuss it with someone higher up. I figure OK, someone there must have heard of the customer is always right. I mean they are a huge company, and it seems a pretty small cost to keep a customer happy right? The better part of a week passes and nobody calls or e-mails. I call the customer service guy back and he has no clue who I am. We go over everthing again and now I am losing it. He tells me someone will be in touch. I find Shafi Keislers e-mail adress on the www and I e-mail him with my problem. Nothing from Shafi nothing from customer service. I send several e-mails to customer sevice with no response, until I get an e-mail from The business manager explaining that I am wrong and that the only offer I will get has been given, and he would rather have me return it than have me unhappy and bad mouthing them on various forums. I agree and ask when they will be sending the shipping tag? No response. I finally call the CC company and file the paper work to have the money removed from the account until the dispute is settled. On the day I receive notification that the money has been removed I get an e-mail from Shafi that starts with "Thankyou for reaching out to me" and would I give him a call. I e-mail him back and told him to cut through the crap and e-mail works just fine. He agrees to give me the drive shaft at no charge if I remove all posts. I do, and he does.
But unfortunatley its not over.
I install the trany. Not to bad to install, needed to massage the floor more than just a little, needed to fab a crossmember, fab linkage and in the end had to lean the motor and trans back to achieve the clearance needed at the torsion bar support, had to then rework the exhaust to clear the center link and properly mate with manifolds.
I drive the car around easy for a while and at times it seems to behave erratic, but then clears up. One day getting on the parkway from a stand still I put in low and nail it. It moves forward about ten feet and shifts to second, I lift and it goes back into first. So I test it on a back road and same thing. The last thing I want to do is call these people but I do. I get a guy and we begin a trouble shooting marathon that begins in may and ends in sept. of 09. At some point I discover that the wiring harness is defective and that is what is causing the sometimes erratic shifting but the main problem with not staying in first still continues. After exhausting every possibility of something external he tells me that the trans needs to come out and go back to them. I tell him I'm not fond of this idea, he tells me there is no other way. I ask if this is all covered under warranty and he tells me most likley, but they won't know until thier transmision builder ( the same one that built and supposedly dyno tested it the first time) determines that it is actualy his fault. He then further informs me that I will have to pay the shipping there (375) and if they determine its not their fault I will have to pay to have it repaired and ship it back. I e-mailed Shafi and asked if because it was so new and because the problem was out of the box could we just do an exchange. He said no. I asked if I could bring it to one of thier so called dealers, he said no. Asked if a local shop of thier aproval could repair it at their expense, he told me no. Given my first experience there just isn't any way I could trust these people to do the right thing. So there it sits in the garage. I will have a local shop go through it in the spring, and I will continue to discredit them as often as I can. If even one person dosn't buy after reading my story I'll have gotten some justification.
 
Sounds as if Keisler has some explaining to do. This is not the first bad thing I've heard from them, but one question comes to mind, why do the magazines say it's so easy to install and worked perfect out of the box?

On Chop Cut Rebuild, Shafi himself delivered a trans for a Camaro and they had problems right out of the gate, pilot bushing too small(althought that could have been GM's fault) and the trans did not line up with the cross member. Now maybe I missed something on that show, and if so I apologize for bringing it up, but how is it so many people who buy from Keisler have so many problems? I feel for ya.
 
Wirenut,
Dude, I am not even going to try and defend what happened between you and Keisler. I wasn't there, so I can just read your side of the story and wonder. I will ask a few questions that are actually more generic. If you buy a product of this nature, engine/transmission/rearend/toaster, whether it's on sale or not, do all companies pay for shipping back and forth regardless of what the problem is? I would honestly like to hear what other builders of performance parts have to say on this. You mention that the cost of this unit is more than you wanted to pay (or thought that it was worth) for an overdrive transmission. What do you think would be fair price for a new late model electronically controlled automatic overdrive? Or how about the harness and computer to operate it? You should price the same trans from your local GM dealer and then add in the harness and computer to operate it. Now factor in the cost of casting a bellhousing to mate the GM trans to the Mopar engine.
You mention the massaging and fabricatiing you had to do for the installation. Would the installation have been any easier had you gone with an A518 based transmission? I would be willing to bet there is a lot more work involved with that, from what I have heard.
As far as your shifting problem goes,
What software program did they have you download into your computer? Are you sure your grounds are extremely good. (Computer controlled anything is very ground sensitive.) My experiences with the GM trannies is that they go into a limp mode if there is a problem and stay in first gear. It almost is never an intermittent problem unless it's a bad ground or a break in the wire.
Out of curiousity, aren't 65 and earlier B body trans crossmembers different that the later ones? The two auto kits I got from Keisler had crossmembers with them, but they were going into later B bodies.

NOW, for the real reason I am writing here.
I am the guy who put that engine and trans together. Tremec actually delivered the 6speed. Shafi was there with his parts for the conversion install. (Bellhousing, hydralic T/O, shifter, x-member, et al.) The problem was pretty much my fault. GM had changed pilot bushing on the LS7 motors, but I had not run into one on any of the previous LS7 5spd installs I had done. The new pilot installs in the crank register much like the late Jeep one does. It's about 10mm difference in depth which is exactly how far I couldn't get that trans to go in. It was one of those moments when I just needed to sit back for a sec and think about it but couldn't because everyone wanted their TV moment and had to keep chipping in their 2 cents or asking what was wrong. After almost climbing the producers tree and pulling the clutch off for the second time, my brain finally engaged and I swapped the pilot out for the earlier rollerized style.
There wasn't a problem with the crossmember, the engine stands were too far foreward, so we modified them to move the motor and trans back roughly 1 and 3/8's of an inch.
 
Rev I tested everything at the connector at the trans. as per Keisler instructions, and if you have worked on these you know how difficult getting to this connector and setting up multi meters for two solonoinds to see if they are receiving ground at the right time and another to make sure the main feed to the unit is maintained isn,t easy. The intermittent problem was a defective wiring harness the first gear thing is clearly internal and likley the valve body. As far as what I think something is worth? I think its worth the least I can get away with paying for it. I bid hundreds of thousands of $ of work each year and and each time I am asked if we can do it for less. Thats business. Don't imply that they are performing a non profit service. Why would magazines tout this co.? He provides free equipment, in exchange for free exposure and they get to fill pages. Is it me or does anybody else think this "kuda" article in MA is a bit absurd? An everymans car? Really? That anybody could easily afford? Really? We need Keilsler to show us what parts are readily available to build a car like this? Really?
 
Keisler's side of the story.

Guys,

I am the salesman who sold him his non complete kit and warned there was going to be work to do. This gentleman is not feeding you guys all the facts as stated. The worst thing we could of done with him is give in to his threats. He is an impossible to please customer who flex's the muscle of (oh I am going to post bad stuff). As all of you know from time to time we make mistakes and sometimes we don't handle them properly.


In business you cant make everyone happy.

Anyway here is our story.

He receives a quote. For a complete kit. I just looked on the old quote no where on it does it say "bolt on and go"

The quote was around $3800 for a complete kit. We then had a year end deal on a "basic kit" as I explained to Gary before he gave me his credit card. This was a basic kit that included the following

Trans
Bell
yoke
cooling lines
controller and some hardware.
Flexplate and converter.

That is it.

I adjust the order send him and email take his money and a month later deliver the trans.

Now common sense would tell you if the kit is discounted $700 there would be less parts. Here is a link to the newsletter offer we sent out. I explained this too him before ordering and again when he called after the fact. This gentleman is persistent and got to Shafi who wants to make everyone happy. So he gives in.


In the past we have bent over backwards to help people to learn we were not at fault and it has cost us thousands.

Keisler is done with this gentleman's abuse and threatening. We are not going to waste any more time or money until we can determine its not directly related to the install. I can tell all of you that I just sent Certified a trans after 2 years in a car they found that they made a mistake and covered the repair 1 year after the warranty.They could of lied and said it wasn't there fault. They are a stand up company as we are.The gentleman who owned it paid for the shipping back as stated in the warranty. They covered all the parts and labor an sent it back to him.

Gene
Keisler Engineering
866.609.0070 ext 211
[email protected]
 
Sounds as if Keisler has some explaining to do. This is not the first bad thing I've heard from them, but one question comes to mind, why do the magazines say it's so easy to install and worked perfect out of the box?

On Chop Cut Rebuild, Shafi himself delivered a trans for a Camaro and they had problems right out of the gate, pilot bushing too small(althought that could have been GM's fault) and the trans did not line up with the cross member. Now maybe I missed something on that show, and if so I apologize for bringing it up, but how is it so many people who buy from Keisler have so many problems? I feel for ya.


The crossmember was a new prototype at the time. The transmission was the new Magnum T56. We had to start somewhere. Unfortunately they don't show you all of the takes. We had actually take a couple versions of the crossmember. The car they built still has one of them. We have also sold numerous T56 magnum kits since the work just fine.


To still be the number #1 Tremec reseller we obviously don't have allot of problems. It just goes back to the old adage One unhappy customer tells everyone, the happy customers are out driving their car!


Gene
Keisler Sales
888.609.0070 ext 211
[email protected]
 
Wingnut,
Hey man, I really am not trying to ruffle anyones feathers. I also never implied or inferred that Keisler was operating a non-profit organization. Quite the opposite. I was merely pointing out comparative or even perceived value. I know on any paticular item that is sold out of our shop, there isn't a 25% cushion in the profit margin. Unless a manufacturer offers a sale price, I can't usually play with the costs on what we sell all that much.
As to why would magazines tout his (or anyone else's) company? Really? C'mon. Do you really think it's "FREE" advertising? It's not free if you're "giving" a 3 or 4 thousand doller product away. It's not free if some mechanic is "giving" away a day or two of labor. It's not free if you are "lending" a workspace for the duration of the project. It's paid advertising. It's about getting your product out in front of as many people as possible, in as many ways as possible. Do you think your favorite magazine is on the newstand because the guys that run the publishing company really care about our hobby? It's on the newstand because the advertising space they sell in that magazine is profitable. You don't think football is on tv because people like watching it do you?
As far as the "Kuda" build goes, regardless of the fact Shafi paid for the building of that car, whether or not it's affordable to everyone, it's does illustrate what's out there.
Alot of guys don't know what is or isn't available for their cars, read some of the posts here. Is all of it good stuff, no, but at least folks are trying.
 
And you both have a vested interest in Keisler in one form or another. Very convincing.
 
I have no idea who is right and who is wrong here. The only thing I question is this "sale" that doesn't really sound like a sale. On the surface it sounds like wingnut originally asked for a complete kit, then got "a" kit on "sale", only it wasn't the same kit as what he had originally tried to order.

Kinda like "An SRT-8 Challenger is $45,000 loaded. But there's a "sale"....only what you get for the $32,000 "sale" price is a not so fully equipped R/T"
 
Yeah except its not quite that simple. And if it were not for the deception during the sale, the current problem would'nt seem so bad, and I may trust them to do the right thing. I don't . And, I don't think it right to charge a customer anything for you mistake. Anyone thinking of dealing with them should give it more thought than I did. Cheaters never prosper in the long run, they file for bankrupcy, as is being proven by Mr. Keisler.
Good Luck.
 
My buddy Installed one of the first automatic keisler sold , THey had lots of problems with it , the shift solnoid was defective . He did a ton of research and R & D for them figured out there problem for them. They said thanks and oh yeah we are not compensating you anything. Car runs fine now but they have the worst customer service and are all about the money , and not the customer .

I'm sure there are a ton more stories out there , this is just the tip .
 
Oh look another rare instance!
 
my buddy installed one of the first automatic keisler sold , they had lots of problems with it , the shift solnoid was defective . He did a ton of research and r & d for them figured out there problem for them. They said thanks and oh yeah we are not compensating you anything. Car runs fine now but they have the worst customer service and are all about the money , and not the customer .

I'm sure there are a ton more stories out there , this is just the tip .

oh look another rare instance!

oh yeah a buddy of a buddy!!!!!
 
Yeah except its not quite that simple. And if it were not for the deception during the sale, the current problem would'nt seem so bad, and I may trust them to do the right thing. I don't . And, I don't think it right to charge a customer anything for you mistake. Anyone thinking of dealing with them should give it more thought than I did. Cheaters never prosper in the long run, they file for bankrupcy, as is being proven by Mr. Keisler.
Good Luck.

No deception just you hearing what you wanted too.
 
I have no idea who is right and who is wrong here. The only thing I question is this "sale" that doesn't really sound like a sale. On the surface it sounds like wingnut originally asked for a complete kit, then got "a" kit on "sale", only it wasn't the same kit as what he had originally tried to order.

Kinda like "An SRT-8 Challenger is $45,000 loaded. But there's a "sale"....only what you get for the $32,000 "sale" price is a not so fully equipped R/T"

As stated in the previous post. This was all explained to him before he ordered. His lack of hearing what I said is the problem. I posted the old newsletter he received it said basic kit. Not at all what he was quoted.
 
Keisler

This is going to be the last post for me on this subject...

In this case Keisler is absolutely in the right. The only wrong we have done by him is give into his threatening. Its funny that it took him a long time to post this after his issues.

If anyone has any questions you can pm me or email me.

Gene
Keisler Sales
[email protected]
 
This is going to be the last post for me on this subject...

In this case Keisler is absolutely in the right. The only wrong we have done by him is give into his threatening. Its funny that it took him a long time to post this after his issues.

If anyone has any questions you can pm me or email me.

Gene
Keisler Sales
[email protected]

best thing you could have ever done you were digging your self in to a bigger hole .
 
I have never seen or driven a car with a Keisler unit in it let alone done business with them, so my comments here are based on what I have read on various Internet sites AND from a BUSINESS standpoint. I was in the auto business for 30 years in both sales and ownership.

I have seen what seems to be a lot of "bad press" for Keisler in comparision to other suppliers in the hobby. There is always two sides to a story and even when both sides respond in print you really don't know what took place unless you can have running dialog with both parties at the same time.

From what I have read there is fault on both sides in this case.

First the customer should have checked the "part number" requote that he received BEFORE he bought to confirm that he was getting what he was expecting.

The supplier has given a link in their response to justify their position, however it doesn't PROVE anything for this situation. There is no way to tell which kit was involved here as the prices the buyer referenced above don't correspond with anything shown.
There are price discounts based on how much you spend and package prices that are called "Essentials kits" but no reference to which kit was in question in this situation. If you read the definition of "essential" in this context, it means of utmost importance, imparative, necessary. You would think that a kit described as "essential" would have all parts necessary for installtion for a running vehicle. If not it should be spelled out what else is necessary. I should think this kit would be called a "basic kit" and indicate not all parts required for installation.

It is my understanding that Keisler is an engineering company that both sells other manufacturers parts as well as their own items that create a complete package. I also understand the desire from both the customer and manufacturer's side to have available a partial kit. HOWEVER, I have always felt as a salesman and a business owner that things need to be clearly explained as to what you are getting when a "sale" is offered. This is typically not what happens in most cases. Sales people are hungry for a sale and don't always consider the problem that may arise from "creative twisting" of what is included later on. Many KNOW it may be a problem but consider the odds of how many people will complain and make waves about it, and consider it an acceptable risk.

Keisler makes comments about a crossmember (not related to the OPs problem) as a prototype, "The crossmember was a new prototype at the time. The transmission was the new Magnum T56. We had to start somewhere." To me, this was just a plain BAD business decision to use something like this for a hobby magazine article that features your company and its abilities. Prototypes are for internal use to work out the bugs BEFORE it is offered to the public NOT for a magazine that is really advertising for your company. A lesson learned in this case as it shows that the supplier was not prepared or aware of what was necessary. This seems to be the recurring theme of problems I hear with online complaints about Keisler. I think Keisler needs to take a long hard look at their entire way of presenting their product. Be honest in what is provided, what is necessary, and what it takes to INSTALL their kits for each specific vehicle. If they have never sold or installed a kit in a particular vehicle TELL the potential customer and make sure that they sign an agreement to this effect BEFORE they accept payment. You will loose some sales doing this, but if you had those lost sales it is very likely that those are the ones that will give you bad press. Is it worth it?
 
And you both have a vested interest in Keisler in one form or another. Very convincing.

What's my vested interest? I am a technician, a mechanic, and an enthusiest. I am not on commission, I get no kickback, I am not a salesman, nor do I work for Keisler Engineering. So, where is my vested interest? In my shop, we install products that work for both us and the customer. I back these guys up because I have had plenty of good experiences with their product and service. I didn't bad mouth YOU for having an unhappy experience, but only wished to understand you position better, and if possible offer help. I thought that is what these forums were for.
As far as the crossmember deal goes, it was on the show Chop Cut Rebuild. It was clearly stated that this was a new product and these were prototype parts. Nobody was being mislead. In fact, it was supposed to be a glimpse into what goes into this type of project.
But apparently, we all can't be as perfect as you folks.
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top