• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

68 Roadrunner Coupe vs. Hardtop

WISCOPAR

Active Member
Local time
6:38 PM
Joined
Dec 15, 2015
Messages
44
Reaction score
13
Location
Wisconsin
The research I've done shows the Hardtops bring a few more bucks than the coupes. This I find odd because the production numbers on the hard tops were higher despite the initial expense of the vehicle.

What do you guys think of the hard top vs. the coupe/post cars?
 
Personally I like the look of the hardtops especially cruising with all the windows down, the coupe is probably a better choice if your racing because the post adds allot of rigidity to the body.
Its all a matter of personal taste, they are both awesome.
 
I agree with you on the sale part. I have a 69 post car and I love how it breaks up that window opening.
 
I love the coupes......and they tend to rattle less :D
 
Real road runners are sedans/coupes.....with no girly options.
 
There's a reason why the hardtops bring more money ... :icon_thumleft:
 
While I like options on a charger & GTX, a low-option Road Runner coupe has always appealed to me.
 
That's your stripper fetish reading its ugly head again.
 
my first new car was a '68 road runner coupe, 383 4spd, 3.55 axle/cooling package, AA1 buffed silver with a black interior and black pin stripe.
 
I always prefered a coupe simply because it's the underdog of the two. However, now that I stuff my 3 kids into the back seat basically every time i take it out, I think the hardtop, with its rear window that rolls down, would probably be nicer for them in the summer.
 
my first new car was a '68 road runner coupe, 383 4spd, 3.55 axle/cooling package, AA1 buffed silver with a black interior and black pin stripe.

:werd:Excellent taste. I may be a bit biased, though.
 
The research I've done shows the Hardtops bring a few more bucks than the coupes. This I find odd because the production numbers on the hard tops were higher despite the initial expense of the vehicle.

What do you guys think of the hard top vs. the coupe/post cars?

Why do you find it odd that a car that was originally more expensive brings more bucks now?

Coupes outnumbered hard tops in 1968, but not 1969.
 
I stand corrected. Per the "red book" the coupe had 29,240 built in 68 vs. 15,358 hard tops. I was apparently looking at the wrong year. Thanks for your input.
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top