• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Stumble on Launch off the 2-Step

Mike Gaines

Well-Known Member
Local time
6:39 AM
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
2,098
Reaction score
4,296
Location
Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
I have been racing only using my footbrake (I do not have a transbrake). I apply the footbrake on the start line and bring the RPM up to 3000 just riding against the converter (5000 flash). The brakes will hold it at 3000 RPM.....and everything is fine with this technique (when I release the footbrake and floor the gas it LAUNCHES HARD,,,not stumble, no miss, no farts,,,,it just kicks butt and goes)....BUT....I do have a 2-Step Box attached to my MSD Ignition with an adjustable low end chip that I have set at 3000 RPM (just like the guys have who use it with a transbrake)....I have a toggle switch where I can activate the low end rev limiter on the 2-step which is activated off my footbrake brake light switch....and I want to be able to use this method to launch the car...activating the 2-step rev limiter by depressing the brake pedal, flooring the accelerator pedal and then the motor comes up to 3000 rpm when it starts dropping cylinders to limit the rpm to 3000....everything is fine up until this point.....but....when I release the foot brake to launch the car I get a fraction of a second "stumble", NOT a clean start. I am sure it is in the carb adjustment somewhere but I do not know where to start. It is a brand new Dominator 1050 that works perfect using the footbrake launch without the 2-step and works perfect going down the track (10.582 @ 126.33) but I need to get rid of the stumble when launching off the 2-step box...SUGGESTIONS PLEASE
 
Last edited:
If the carb work correctly when not using the 2 step then it's probably in the split second that it takes the brake switch to release as your flooring it. You might add a spring to the brake pedal to quicken the release of the switch. JMO.
 
Thanks... I will try putting a second, or stronger spring, on my brake pedal to see if this solves the problem....would never have thought of that.
Has anyone had similar problem and what did you do to solve it...it you don't have a problem with a "stumble" coming off the 2-step...did you have to re-adjust your carb in any way ????? Thanks for input.
 
Last edited:
Mike, you might want to check over on yellowbullet. I know when i try my 2 step my sixty is slow . It is i suspect because there is no pump shot left . If you had a O2 sensor you might see this . Are you still using a powervalve ?
You may not have enough rpm to pull enough fuel/air , try a bit higher rpm . Dont forget on the 2step you should be able to hold a higher rpm due to loss of tq

Tex
 
You have a huge carb with no pump shot at low rpm with no air speed through the intake tract. Why use a 2 step?
Doug
 
If the carb work correctly when not using the 2 step then it's probably in the split second that it takes the brake switch to release as your flooring it. You might add a spring to the brake pedal to quicken the release of the switch. JMO.

Well, I have a 2-step which I haven't hooked up, so I'm no expert.... but this sounds very possible & cheap/easy to try.... especially if the carb runs perfectly without the 2-step.
 
Make sure you have a good quality switch, don't use the OEM one. Make sure it has a short travel.
 
Lack of pump shot would be my guess as well....

On the foot brake and brought up against the convertor at 3000 rpm, you have lots of pump shot left when you floor it and release the foot brake.

On the 2 step, you've already floored it, the pump shot is gone, and all 4 barrels are wide open with nothing to cover a momentary lean spot.

Splicer.
 
Lack of pump shot would be my guess as well....

On the foot brake and brought up against the convertor at 3000 rpm, you have lots of pump shot left when you floor it and release the foot brake.

On the 2 step, you've already floored it, the pump shot is gone, and all 4 barrels are wide open with nothing to cover a momentary lean spot.

Splicer.
Thanks....that sounds like a perfect explanation. I am going to try the "2-step" launch just bringing the rpm up to 3100 (just where the low end chip starts dropping cylinders) and then I will floor it the rest of the way the instant I release the footbrake....this should test this theory which sure sounds reasonable to me....thanks
 
Thanks....that sounds like a perfect explanation. I am going to try the "2-step" launch just bringing the rpm up to 3100 (just where the low end chip starts dropping cylinders) and then I will floor it the rest of the way the instant I release the footbrake....this should test this theory which sure sounds reasonable to me....thanks
Why even use the chip? Put it in prestage. Set the RPM with your right foot. Bump it in using your left foot only. With practice you can be with-in 50 RPM.
Doug
 
Not sure this is relevant to your situation but when my car got into the 10s it started to stumble like you describe. I tried float levels and pump shot adjustments but when I put in jet extensions it was fixed. I was on the two step but was using a trans brake as well.
 
Why even use the chip? Put it in prestage. Set the RPM with your right foot. Bump it in using your left foot only. With practice you can be with-in 50 RPM.
Doug

Many racers tell me I will have a better REACTION TIME if I use the 2-step since it eliminates 1 of the two actions you have to take to launch the car off the footbrake...1) lift the foot brake 2) floor the accelerator.
With the 2-step the gas pedal part of the launch is already done...just release the footbrake and "go".... does this make any sense.
Let me know your opinions.Thanks
 
Consistency is the name of the game. You can adjust R/T to make it quicker. Inconsistency is much harder to cure. Show me a grouping of R/T with-in .015 and that can be upgraded, even if it's .100-.115. Show me .005-.090 your in trouble. I've never driven a race car that couldn't get to .000 on a .500 tree off the foot brake. .400 tree is tough.
Doug
 
NENDRA runs a .400 full tree. Talk about tough. Worst light last weekend was a .035.
 
NENDRA runs a .400 full tree. Talk about tough. Worst light last weekend was a .035.
I've run the .400 full tree and hate it. I don't understand why any association does it. Doesn't fit well with any type of car. With our type of car you have to bump in deeper or guess. That being said I've run it 4 times, 2 wins, 2 runner ups.
Doug
 
I've run the .400 full tree and hate it. I don't understand why any association does it. Doesn't fit well with any type of car. With our type of car you have to bump in deeper or guess. That being said I've run it 4 times, 2 wins, 2 runner ups.
Doug


Maybe one day, you could try a race with NENDRA.
And see how you would do racing against these racers.
These guys are all very good.
And see if the clocks are wrong at Milan.
 
Gave up on Milan. 2 weeks ago at 131 Motorplex it went 9.11 scubbing 8 mph with Eddy carbs @85degrees. It should roll next week at Norwalk at Monster Mopar.
Doug
 
Last edited:
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top