No issues with disagreeing. I am picky, and I do want to know. And after 30 years of these things you've seen almost everything. That's why I am how I am. I'll add - my customers benefit from my "darker view"...lol.
In regard to Blueprint directly its a feeling that I get, knowing what I do, from the way it's advertised. I agree - the majority of crate engine buyers are in a predicament - be it money, time, or availbility of quality locally. So to me, listing dyno sheets and that it's sonic tested, and the warranty are misleading and by design target those who know they need or want something, but do not have the familiarity with the mass rebuilder world. Read the warranty. It leaves the decisions regarding warranty to Blueprint, and does not include paid labor but rather whatever BP thinks it might be worth, it has to all have been done by a licensed repair facility to be valid, and it does not include freight. A buyer that installs it and has an issue has little recourse. Period.
I mentioned the history because I was there when they were first written. Strangely I do not give much credence to internet silence and "we got better".
I've installed my share of crate engines. Mostly during my tenure as a tech. GM crates, whether produced by GM or others, have a MUCH better track record (pun intended) than any Mopar crates. And pricing is always a function of two main things: prices of parts; and potential market. In comparison GM crates sell by the thousands. Mopar crates sell by the hundreds. Profit in crate engines is in parts sourcing and speed with which machining and assembly can be done. Cheap engines simply cannot get the attention a performance engine should get. At least according to me...lol. They have their place.
It's like comparing a $7 bottle of wine with a really nice label with a $40 bottle with a really nice label. Some people will think wine-is-wine and love it. Some can't tell because they've never had a $40 bottle. Ignorance can be bliss.