As I, and many others have said, " There's at least SOME truth to every legend or myth." Why else perpetuate such legends and myths/ stories throughout many centuries? You wouldn't bother to pass down such info unless it was important. As for the Giza pyramids, lets look at it logically. 2.5 MILLION stones, all of them many tons in weight. These stones are sitting on a bedrock absolutely flat. The declination of the base has not moved more than 1/4 INCH in untold centuries. Impossible with todays advanced methods of building. 6" over 100 years is the standard today. The apex's of the three pyramids Pointed exactly to the three stars in Orion's belt in the year 10, 450 BC. This the ONLY time they do, UNLESS you go back one full procession of Earth's passage through the axis of rotation of more than 26,000 years to the time they also lined up. At any rate, they could not have been built after 10,450BC or they would not be dead on balls lined up with those three stars. Period, no argument possible at all. Simply could not have been done.
Now, back to those stones. I will concede that they could have been quarried up river and floated down on barges. That would have required a LOT of effort in itself, over many, many years.
So, given that scenario those stones would also have to have been unloaded from said floating barges and moved uphill to the building site. From whence they would have to be moved into place. it would have taken decades to smooth the bedrock base to begin with. Then to get the first stones in place exactly so, because as you go up they also have to remain lined up so they arrive at the apex still in perfect alignment. Remember also that the pyramids are 8 sided. Not 4. Okay, so we have the stones coming up from the river Nile, the second row needs to be lifted some 5-6 feet up. Each one. And, each one has to be dressed by stonemasons so that there is no gap. try to pick up a dead smooth block of polished granite that weighs even one ton. Good luck with that. So you say, " Well, they had to be lifted off the barges, right? So use the same method to lift the stones into place". Okay, i'll buy that for the first two rows, maybe. Third row and up? No chance. 400+ feet up? Even less chance.
My point is that once you begin to break down the building process logically it just cannot be done using the tools and methods in evidence at the time we are "told" that they were built by Archeologists. (Read charlatan's).
So then, class, where does that leave us?
That leaves us with the pyramids being built by more advanced peoples later in history, which we know is not true, or, being built by a civilization from a much earlier time. Because, if the time they were built in preceded the old dynasty by very much they would have recorded that somewhere. Right? So they MUST have been built so far back in antiquity that all knowledge of them is reduced to legend and myths. Okay, say that is true. We now run up against the Great Flood. everyone but a few were wiped out, yes? It happened around 12,600- 15,500BC.So then, carrying that forward then the builders must have been survivors of the flood in 10,450 BC. You know, when those star alignments are correct. So if THAT's true we are saying those survivors who would have been left with nothing but their skins after the Great Flood then somehow gained, at a minimum of 2500 years the abilities needed to erect these great monuments? And then promptly forgot to record the deeds anywhere? And also forgot how it was done because nobody later on knew that information. WE have progressed a mire 6500 years or so, if those pesky archeologists are to be believed, and WE cant do it.
Okay, say all of THAT is BS, which it must be. right?
That leaves us with the pyramids being built in 36,450+ then right? Because of that other pesky FACT, the alignment to the stars. Lets say that is true.
Where then is the evidence of that great civilization existence? THEY must have been much more advanced than we presently are right? After all, WE cant build them today.
You say, " Well, that was a long time ago, those bones would be dust, right?"
Nope, remember those big assed dino's from like 65 million years ago? Yeah, THOSE bones are just fine as fossils.
So then, a great civilization of advanced peoples must have existed to build those pyramids. Where did they go, because they are gone completely. No trace has been found so far. We can see back millions of years in ice cores and sediments of geological structures. No traces of these advanced people or there doings, as they MUST have had some affect on their surroundings right? We sure have. Nope, nada.
So then, class, what does this all mean?
It means that A. There has been at least one enormous cataclysm that rewrote the face of the planet so deeply that any trace is long buried so deep that we will never find it. If this were true then how did the pyramids survive?
or B. That whomever those peoples were they were able to leave the planet.
or C. Devine intervention of some sort. WHISKING them all way without a trace.
or D. they were burned to a crisp by some solar thing and the ashes blown away.
At any rate, those pyramids were NOT built in like 4500 BC. Not in 10,450BC and maybe not in 36,450BC + either.
So then, that leaves us with an even earlier time? Same set of questions apply, where are they?