There have been tons of threads on here about the do's and don'ts of disc brake swaps. Tons of trial and error and spending tons of money trying to solve the issue. IMO, Chrysler solved it for us by using the dual diaphragm booster with disc brakes on these cars. I know first hand since I was one of the guys that tried using the drum brake booster on my 68 Charger. It is human nature to think that a little boost is better than none at all. That was my reasoning. I had 20" of vacuum at idle and was sure I could make the drum booster work. Sent it out to Booster Dewey for rebuild even though it seemed to work. Tried 3 different master cylinders, bled the brakes a dozen times, changed proportioning valves a couple times. I ran out of things to try and got plenty of wrong info from people who think they know what they are talking about. Finally, when speaking with Cass at Dr Diff., I got the correct info. Change out that damn single diaphragm booster to the dual diaphragm booster like Mopar did and your problems with hard pedal and inability to stop the car goes away. For all those naysayers that want to argue the point, I have a rebuilt drum brake booster for them. You can squander all the coin you want trying to come up with a combination that will work. Stupidity is expensive. My advice, Follow Mopar's lead. They ran into the same issue when they started experimenting with disc brakes. Their engineers would not have spent the money on the dual diaphragm if it was not needed.