I'm pretty sure the ports on my 240s are American
To me? If you really want to improve performance? Invent a distributor that can offer real time variable timing? How many of us chase the rabbit of "It idles great at 5°-10° more advanced timing. But then starts drop off in performance or even some pinging at higher RPM?"
Add any boost? And this rabbit get faster. I know MSD has chips that attempt to simulate taking timing out at higher RPM. But what if you really could? It might not be possible to adjust valve timing while engine is running? Too much counter stress on cam. But ignition timing?
Just thinking out loud here.
The "EFI" Changes a whole lot. I'm thinking something simpler? Perhaps a rotation dist cap? Electric based on RPM? Slight adjustment to retard as RPM increases? Curve would be set based on build?Get a Holley Hyperspark distributor and box (along with EFI) and you can do just that.
The "EFI" Changes a whole lot. I'm thinking something simpler? Perhaps a rotation dist cap? Electric based on RPM? Slight adjustment to retard as RPM increases? Curve would be set based on build?
Maybe I'm missing something here.
Perhaps you could enlighten us as with what to do and why rather than just (what I felt) bashing us. I'd love to learn...
Only one way to know for sure.
On the intake ports, the "roughness" of the port surface creates a slight turbulence that helps keep the fuel mixture atomized.
So if we had not polished the ports in these '906' heads we would have made more than 748 HP?
Well that sucks. I guess we're not "state of the art". I'm so ashamed............
View attachment 1136483
my engine guy polished the ports smooth on my TFS240's and it made a difference, Turbulence went away completely and the power did go up significately. Like Tom told me have you ever seen a Pro-Stock or superstock with ribs in them??? I didn't think so. The reason it's there is to keep price down, Go ask very successful, experienced engine builders like Dwayne,Jim, Tom @ TK Race, Ray Barton etc... and you will get the same response.My 451 with a flat tappet and making 12" vacuum got easily over 600 on both sides and a fabulous street engine, well behaved and very street able.
We all may be talking apples & grapefruits here. I've never seen a TF 240 head, so I don't know what the finish is. Having said that, a slightly rough finish is common on the intake port to keep the fuel from re-liquifying on the port wall. That roughness may vary. If TF240's have "ridges", that sounds like an unfinished port to be final finished by an experienced porter.
My intake ports would surely look "polished" compared to a rough cast iron head. Just say'in.
Both, but most of the turbulance was on the intake side, The flow bench was bouncing all over the place and after smoothening out it was stable as can beIntake and exhaust ports? or just exhaust polished?
Spot on, I haven't seen too many Nascar teams, Drag teams leaving CNC ribs in the heads or even adding them, Look at the best head guys none have those ribs. They only reason they are there is because it costs more to remove them and in order to keep production costs down they leave them. I've seen back to back test with and without the ribs and there was a sizable gain without, I totally agree with IQ52, Barton, MBE Cylinder heads and the likes by removing them. I'm just stating my opinion and real life experiences that can help out our fellow Mopar enthusiasts.So if we had not polished the ports in these '906' heads we would have made more than 748 HP?
Well that sucks. I guess we're not "state of the art". I'm so ashamed............
View attachment 1136483