The words are the same but the bold in the above quote are from IQ52. Boy was that ever true on the one I was cursed to work on. It's all right now but it took many dollars to correct. I really pray the new ones are a bunch better.I am currently building a 572. It is an old block not a new one though. The machine shop had to do lots to make it right, but it should be a great bracket motor in my car.
Thanks for the heads up my friend!The words are the same but the bold in the above quote are from IQ52....I really pray the new ones are a bunch better.
They show a 4.240 bore, and a 4.490 bore.I am currently building a 572.
Keeping in mind I'm really green when it comes to this, I saw a pair of TrickFlow heads on a BB Chevy today, "TF 280" so that makes me think the 270s are definitely the best choice with the power handling capabilities of an aftermarket block vs the 240s??It's going to look beautiful under a pair of TrickFlow 270s... I can't see going with TrickFlow 240s with the capabilities that block has, or ???
It astounds me in this day of CNC that new blocks would need anything beyond hone to fit. Line hone, lifter bores, cam bores, deck should be within .000x of factory spec. Needs a lot of work and $5-8K for a new part, nope
Doug
Then how do they machine them? Slow and inefficient on poor tooling? Regardless, sloppy machining is sloppy machining. Why would you pay thousands to "fix" a new block? Why even bother "finish machining" if it's no good? That's just plain dumb business. I dont know about current KB and World blocks. But Indys stuff isn't build ready. And apparently neither were the previous World blocks.the volume just does not support it
Can we get a "group purchase" going?if somebody would order a couple hundred thousand units
It's not the cost of the block in question. It's the fact that it has to be machined. Why would line bore, lifter bores, etc be incorrect on a new block? No reason for it.the castings themselves are low volume, if somebody would order a couple hundred thousand units they would be a lot cheaper, same with machining. To set up and do just a few big $$$. Its not that the machining is poor, it should not be. Its just a matter of all the engineering, setup, labor divided by a small number of blocks = expensive block
Well, Trick Flow 270s are going to be my choice. I get a kick out of being able to say my engine will have"Max Wedge" sized ports (forgive the teenager in me).that makes me think the Trick Flow 270s are definitely the best choice with the power handling capabilities of an aftermarket block
With a 4.25 stroke crank, so that same thing about me that gets kicks out of the "Max Wedge" sized ports is thrilled about the 4.25 stroke, for a total of FIVE HUNDRED FOURTY-ONE cubic inches!what strokes are typically combined with those bores and what total cu in size are the results?