Gen II Hemi in 66 Plym, headers?

[PsyOps]

I am looking at buying a 1966 Plymouth Satellite, SB/727, driver, to eventually put a Gen II hemi into. The Hemi will be stock dimentions. Before I pull the trigger on the sale, I cannot find a set of headers for the swap. Almost all header applications say they'll fit a '67 so why not a '66? Am I missing something? Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

 

[PsyOps]

OK, I'm an idiot. Just had to scroll down the TTI website a little more. Issue resolved. Sorry to waste everyone's time.

 

[Jerry Hall]

Don't feel bad, there are a lot of differences between 66-67. Dimensionality they are the same car in the engine compartment.

 

[Cranky]

Don't feel bad, there are a lot of differences between 66-67. Dimensionality they are the same car in the engine compartment.

Lots differences besides the real obvious. A lot of people don't even notice the steering column is different or the dual pot MC to name a couple. Other than that, yup, same body/frame....

 

[Nxcoupe]

I am looking at buying a 1966 Plymouth Satellite, SB/727, driver, to eventually put a Gen II hemi into. The Hemi will be stock dimentions. Before I pull the trigger on the sale, I cannot find a set of headers for the swap. Almost all header applications say they'll fit a '67 so why not a '66? Am I missing something? Any insight would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.

Holley has everything from motor mounts to headers to trans mounts and of course stand alone engine management.

 

[Rich H.]

Holley has absolutely nothing for Gen II.

 

[Nxcoupe]

Holley has absolutely nothing for Gen II.

Sorry, thought it said Gen III. I'm used to those hemis being referred to as 426 Hemis or just a hemi. Hooker makes headers for B bodies with a Hemi, don't they? I'd have to look.

 

[PsyOps]

Thanks for the responses. I've read horror stories here & on other sites that repeatedly trash Hooker headers. People that use TTIs seem to be well pleased with them. In looking at the TTI site, I note the variety of design for different years and combs of blocks/heads/suspensions while Hooker has two part numbers for different primary tube sizes. I'll pay the extra $$$ for better engineering rather than spending the same money on headache medicine & contributions to the swearing jar. I appreciate ya'll.

 

[1STMP]

Sorry to bust in, but have you considered
custom? Given you have a mfg nearby?
This set on a custom tube frame 440
equipped cost me $340.00.
PM if you would like the name and
number of the place that did mine.
He did a set for me on a V-8 equipped
Jeep 20 years ago. Zero problems.