- Local time
- 9:34 PM
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2014
- Messages
- 32,401
- Reaction score
- 49,988
- Location
- South Louisiana
The explanation I got from Ed at Molnar is that the length of the stroke (4.5") affects the timing of the oiling. It may also have to do with the rod bearing as well. I was concerned when I was told that the oil passage in my Molnar crank is not "straight shot" like Chrysler uses.
I don't know enough to wrap my head around it, but the caution that the builder (not my builder) gave was that it could lead to oil deprivation of a portion of the crank main bearings, and centrifugal force played a negative role in that.
Although I got the "not our first rodeo" and "Ray Barton" uses Molnar, and other similar replies, that seems a bit dismissive to me. To his credit, Ed at Molnar also went into some detail, which I related as best as I could. In the end, I accepted Ed's more detailed explanation, and that my builder is experienced in Mopar and even Bill Mitchell aluminum block based stroker engine builds, but I would like to know more from any of you on this topic please.
If any forum members can enlighten me further, I'd appreciate it.
I don't know enough to wrap my head around it, but the caution that the builder (not my builder) gave was that it could lead to oil deprivation of a portion of the crank main bearings, and centrifugal force played a negative role in that.
Although I got the "not our first rodeo" and "Ray Barton" uses Molnar, and other similar replies, that seems a bit dismissive to me. To his credit, Ed at Molnar also went into some detail, which I related as best as I could. In the end, I accepted Ed's more detailed explanation, and that my builder is experienced in Mopar and even Bill Mitchell aluminum block based stroker engine builds, but I would like to know more from any of you on this topic please.
If any forum members can enlighten me further, I'd appreciate it.
Last edited: