Superbird Wagon

[jimbosride]

I think it looks cool? Not sure if it's a AI picture?

 

[ckessel]

It would be interesting to run that through some CFD/Aero calculations.

 

[kiwigtx]

I think it looks cool? Not sure if it's a AI picture?

View attachment 2055435

Definitely an image by Artificial Insemination....the fuel bowser is proportionally larger that the car next to it.

Like Bigfoot next to a Tonka toy.

 

[mmissile]

God awful.

 

[RemCharger]

Lol look at the wheels

 

[kiwigtx]

Insufficient space on the sides for the wing feet to be mounted suitably.

 

[matthon]

Can't unsee.

 

[Dodge-Scatpack]

Ummmm, no….

 

[jimbosride]

Definitely an image by Artificial Insemination....the fuel bowser is proportionally larger that the car next to it.

Like Bigfoot next to a Tonka toy.

What's a " Fuel bowser"

Here are some more

 

[matthon]

Fuel bowser

Bowser is an old gas pump maker.

 

[Triplegreen500]

I agree on the wing mounting. I own a '72 wagon, and while they're "hippy", the quarters don't stick out far enough to mount a wing on. There's about an inch at the base of the rear quarter glass, but there is no 'ledge' between the quarter panel and the D pillar; it's a smooth transition.

Yes, I know, my '72 is a different body style...but the same statement applies. I also think wagons (and sedans) had more body lines in the front fenders, and the nose profile wouldn't match.

 

[topside]

Yup, AI - kind of intriguing, though.
IIRC, my '70 Satellite wagon from years ago probably didn't have the width at the quarters to mount the stock Superbird uprights - but a guy could fabricate some narrower ones...
Superbirds used Coronet fenders & hoods, but the front portion if the hoods were modified.

 

[toolmanmike]

Lol look at the wheels

Yep, AI