Thank you! Any ideas on value?
Damn Beekeeper. I suspected it was a interior body mold of some sorts. I have some similar with my '70 Cuda build. But to narrow it down to that specific? The "Tell" suggests somebody has played with A-bodies?that is the passenger side sail panel from a 67-69 fastback barracuda
Damn Beekeeper. I suspected it was a interior body mold of some sorts. I have some similar with my '70 Cuda build. But to narrow it down to that specific? The "Tell" suggests somebody has played with A-bodies?
I KNEW IT! GET HIM! Lol. Actually I'm on E-body as well as A. My current Plymouth stable. (It's my favorite question to my Chevy friends. What do my 3 Mopars have in common? And what is the major difference?I’m secretly an A body guy
I guess i’ll let the cat out of the bag
i go by cudascott over on FABO but i love B bodies too
and i spend 95% of my time here with you guys.
But for the record? The GTX is a better build quality than the A or E. But doesn't matter. Still have to play the hand that's dealt.
I was close to buying a '65 Fury III? Just for the premise of adding a "C" body. It had a performance 383. And of course kept the Plymouth theme. It would have been my 9th Plymouth owned in my tenure. It also kept to another premise? I've never owned a small block. Lol
If I only had the room.
Now that's a "C" body. The Fury I looked at was noticeably smaller. But still classed as C. I'm not actually looking for another project.I was guna say...are ya lookin for a project C-body to add to the collection? She runs and drives, but needs some work. And she comes with LOTS of parts
View attachment 1140958 View attachment 1140959
Now that's a "C" body. The Fury I looked at was noticeably smaller. But still classed as C. I'm not actually looking for another project.