• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Front swap

bearman

FBBO Gold Member
FBBO Gold Member
Local time
12:15 AM
Joined
Jan 9, 2018
Messages
6,209
Reaction score
6,576
Location
Phoenix
Has anyone done that magnum suspension upgrade and if you have was it worth it can i get the pros and cons
 
If you are referring to the Magnum Force replacement suspension and steering kits....
I helped a buddy install one of their tubular kits. The welds looked good...after that, I was not impressed much. He lost suspension travel. The range of suspension travel helps with the ride! It also has a WIDER turning radius. U-Turns now sometimes require a 3 point maneuver instead of one tight turn. I think it was a step backwards, especially when you figure that he spent almost $5000 for the kit.
 
Also..
I won't try to force you into accepting my opinion but let me make a case as to why I think that a well prepared stock based suspension and steering system is a better way to go. First, I will easily admit that the stock stuff is not on par with the handling quality that most new cars have. 40 years of advancements have to be worth something, right? The stock torsion bar suspension can be improved though. By making a few small changes and improvements, you can have a great handling car that retains OEM durability for about half the price of those $5000 tubular setups.

The addition of subframe connectors is a great upgrade. Taking it further, one should add gussets to the K member to stiffen up the steering box mounting area. I did both of these and also welded plates to the lower control arms. I used large anti sway bars, Poly bushings, Bilstein shocks and a Firm Feel stage 3 steering box with Fast Ratio arms. I figure I have less than $2300 in my front and rear suspension. My brakes are 12" discs up front from a Cordoba....Calipers and pads can be found at almost any NAPA store.

Mopar Action magazine had several articles on their 1969 Valiant dubbed "The Green Brick", a street car that they raced on road courses across the country. It had a stock based setup as I do and it blew away Corvettes, Porches and several cars that nobody every expected to lose...

Andy Finkbeiner built a 68 Valiant that was nicknamed "The Red Brick"....It too retained a stock based setup. Andy runs AR Engineering and supplies many parts to Mancini Racing for retail sale. Andy has written several tech articles for Mopar Muscle magazine as well as a few helpful tech books. He has stated that for most purposes, there is no advantage to running a aftermarket tubular K member suspension.

Then there is the issue of engineering: The setups that remove the torsion bars and use a coil over shock mounted in place of the shock are asking for failure. The stock Mopar arrangement was well thought out. Each section was built to carry a specific, limited load. The shock absorber mounts were designed to dampen suspension movement, not to support the weight of the car. Some companies do address this by implementing a reinforcing bar that runs from the firewall to the frame rail. This helps but isn't a nice looking addition to the engine bay.

These cars were designed around rather skinny 5 inch wide 14 inch diameter bias ply tires with limited grip. Today we have wider and taller radials that grip better than race tires of the 60s. The better grip of todays tires will induce flex and distortion in a stock unibody when the road gets curvy. The addition of frame connectors and reinforcements/gussets address this. Stiffen the platform and the suspension does not have to be as stiff for the car to handle better. When the whole car is flexible, the car is just another spring to bend and move.

Some choose the aftermarket setups to get better road feel. This is a great point. The stock steering boxes can be rebuilt and upgraded but to be fair, they are based on a design that dates back to 1957! My Firm Feel steering setup feels great in turns but still has some free play from the center outward....In other words, while driving straight ahead, the free play from center is more than a car or truck with a steering rack. Good news though...BORGESON has a fix for that. They offer a steering box setup that has a 14 to 1 ratio and has none of the slop or free play of the Mopar gear.

The aftermarket does make some shiny new stuff that looks nice. It is new and pretty but I wonder if they would hold up to the same stresses that the stock stuff can.
Good luck in any manner that you decide. It is best to be informed though before spending the money.
 
Well written Kern Dog. A couple of other points, I don’t like the way the tie rod ends connect to the spindle arms hanging from spacers. Just looks easy to bend to me. Modern improvements to the stock K member torsion bar suspension will give good results and be a longer lasting set up.

On the other hand, if you’re putting a 3rd generation Hemi or other modern engine in your Mopar that it wasn’t designed for those tubular front ends cure a lot of problems that you’d run into. Oil pan, header, etc. clearance.

Speaking of the “Green Brick”, if I remember right, it put the famous mega dollar “Big Red” 69 Camaro on the trailer during the One Lap of America rally years ago.
 
That 69 Valiant put several high dollar cars into the toilet!
 
Also..
I won't try to force you into accepting my opinion but let me make a case as to why I think that a well prepared stock based suspension and steering system is a better way to go. First, I will easily admit that the stock stuff is not on par with the handling quality that most new cars have. 40 years of advancements have to be worth something, right? The stock torsion bar suspension can be improved though. By making a few small changes and improvements, you can have a great handling car that retains OEM durability for about half the price of those $5000 tubular setups.

The addition of subframe connectors is a great upgrade. Taking it further, one should add gussets to the K member to stiffen up the steering box mounting area. I did both of these and also welded plates to the lower control arms. I used large anti sway bars, Poly bushings, Bilstein shocks and a Firm Feel stage 3 steering box with Fast Ratio arms. I figure I have less than $2300 in my front and rear suspension. My brakes are 12" discs up front from a Cordoba....Calipers and pads can be found at almost any NAPA store.

Mopar Action magazine had several articles on their 1969 Valiant dubbed "The Green Brick", a street car that they raced on road courses across the country. It had a stock based setup as I do and it blew away Corvettes, Porches and several cars that nobody every expected to lose...

Andy Finkbeiner built a 68 Valiant that was nicknamed "The Red Brick"....It too retained a stock based setup. Andy runs AR Engineering and supplies many parts to Mancini Racing for retail sale. Andy has written several tech articles for Mopar Muscle magazine as well as a few helpful tech books. He has stated that for most purposes, there is no advantage to running a aftermarket tubular K member suspension.

Then there is the issue of engineering: The setups that remove the torsion bars and use a coil over shock mounted in place of the shock are asking for failure. The stock Mopar arrangement was well thought out. Each section was built to carry a specific, limited load. The shock absorber mounts were designed to dampen suspension movement, not to support the weight of the car. Some companies do address this by implementing a reinforcing bar that runs from the firewall to the frame rail. This helps but isn't a nice looking addition to the engine bay.

These cars were designed around rather skinny 5 inch wide 14 inch diameter bias ply tires with limited grip. Today we have wider and taller radials that grip better than race tires of the 60s. The better grip of todays tires will induce flex and distortion in a stock unibody when the road gets curvy. The addition of frame connectors and reinforcements/gussets address this. Stiffen the platform and the suspension does not have to be as stiff for the car to handle better. When the whole car is flexible, the car is just another spring to bend and move.

Some choose the aftermarket setups to get better road feel. This is a great point. The stock steering boxes can be rebuilt and upgraded but to be fair, they are based on a design that dates back to 1957! My Firm Feel steering setup feels great in turns but still has some free play from the center outward....In other words, while driving straight ahead, the free play from center is more than a car or truck with a steering rack. Good news though...BORGESON has a fix for that. They offer a steering box setup that has a 14 to 1 ratio and has none of the slop or free play of the Mopar gear.

The aftermarket does make some shiny new stuff that looks nice. It is new and pretty but I wonder if they would hold up to the same stresses that the stock stuff can.
Good luck in any manner that you decide. It is best to be informed though before spending the money.
 
Thanks this is the kind of answers i been looking for as well i can save some for other part of the project. I will be looking into that gearbox thanks again
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top