Was that even possible?Unless, of course, someone opted for the 400 2bbl 'economy' engine option in the GTO.
Anyway, my brother's goat was 400-4V with a 4 speed.
Was that even possible?Unless, of course, someone opted for the 400 2bbl 'economy' engine option in the GTO.
Yes, in 1967, '68 and '69 the two barrel was an option, with a 265hp. rating.Was that even possible?
Anyway, my brother's goat was 400-4V with a 4 speed.
Here is something that is little known. The famous Car & Driver test of the 1964 GTO with 389 engine v the Ferrari GTO. The Pontiac won the acceleration test.
In the late 90s/early 2000s, an eagle eyed enthusiast spotted something in a photo of the engine in THAT car. A transfer lug. The 389 & 421 are externally identical.....except for the TL on the 421. It was there so the engine could be easily identified on the production line. That car had a 421 & Pontiac cheated.
The Pontiac didn't exactly 'win' the acceleration test, because Ferrari never showed up for that staged trial. However, the Pontiac's 13.1 quarter still made all the news. Pontiac's ad man, Jim Wangers, put the show together and admitted in his 1998 memoirs that he had Royal Pontiac swap in a 421 into the test car. Definitely more than 6.5 litres.![]()