Struggled a lifetime to keep the top number under 139 for CDL. Now old, sedentary, and down to half a bag of chips a night and the numbers are good. WTH? Guess the Meds work.
Do you have any relations in Colorado called Steve by chance?I miss my annual wellness exams since she retired. She was a stunner, who wore a mini skirt and boots when she was 65. She would snuggle close and hold my hand (for pulse) at the close of our consult, and I never failed to yield a good number.
I went to have my yearly physical last month. Mine was 145/87 and she just looked at me wide eyed. She knows me, so when I asked if she was on crack, she just laughed. She brought out the old school cuff and it was 126/68. I looked at her and told her, you know what you can do with that don't you...........I convinced my PCM Tech to use the old-fashioned way of measuring it instead of those inaccurate machines that have a track record of false readings. Yet it seems that everywhere these days, when you need to have it measured, on with the velcro cuff and turn on the noisy thing and get the false reading every time!!! KISS principle has been thrown out the window...cr8crshr/Bill![]()
I've been getting an unpleasant up close lesson lately on how the medical profession's improvements aren't always the best alternative. Fifteen years ago, my wife had a detached retina, which was successfully repaired. A year later, she developed a cataract in that eye, a normal post op side effect, and had a lens replacement. Three months ago, the replacement lens detached from the cornea. Three surgeries later, we are looking at the possibility of a fourth, which would remove the lens, which would not be replaced, in addition to a partial cornea transplant.I went to have my yearly physical last month. Mine was 145/87 and she just looked at me wide eyed. She knows me, so when I asked if she was on crack, she just laughed. She brought out the old school cuff and it was 126/68. I looked at her and told her, you know what you can do with that don't you...........