• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

340 or 360?

noz34me

Member
Local time
1:50 PM
Joined
Jan 8, 2012
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Location
Virginia
Hey guys, new here, and looking for a '73/74 Roadrunner. Going to look at one tomorrow; had one when I was 19 years old. About 3 times that age now.

I know they went to the 360 in '74. My '74 had a 400, my '73 had a 340.

The question I have is, other than displacement is there a big difference between the two?

Did a search, but couldn't find anything related to comparing the two.

Thanks for your help.
 
Friend of mine just did a 340 for his duster, he took out a 360 put a 340 with X heads, said he put about 5000 bucks in the 340 (sorry no details other than he has drag raced a # of years) He just told me he wish he had left the 360 in it, and was very disipointed in the 340. No replacement for displacement? could be. It reminded me of the chevy guys that said the SBC 327 was the mark of the bow tie bunch. But when all is said and done the 350 out preformed the 327 in every circumstance.
 
Around here the guys looking to go original and the stock class drag racers have driven the price of 340's and their heads through the roof, not to mention availability. 360's are pretty easy to come by in these neck of the woods.

Myself, if I wasn't going for originality or 340 bragging rights, I'd go with a 360 and some aftermarket heads/cam...more bang for your buck.

Just my 2 cents...
 
The 340 has a larger bore so if you stroke it, you'll end up with more cubes but the 360 has a longer stroke over a 340 in stock form so it produces more torque. Also, 360's came with lower compression than the early 340's did. They can all be made to run well if you know what you are doing. The 73-74 RR's are kinda heavy so if it were me, I'd go with the longer stroke 360 and bump the compression up some.
 
Over Here The answer would be 340 everytime....dunno what Your motors are like over there? but I would have thought they are the same?

360's were all so strangled over Here...good for boat moorings My Son still say's
 
340 is a better design - short stroke/big bore. I'd rather have the better breathing capacity. Hell all you need is a 340 block, and '72 or earlier 318 crank (steel & same stroke as a 340) buy aftermaket heads and make some serious HP.
 
340 is a better design - short stroke/big bore. I'd rather have the better breathing capacity. Hell all you need is a 340 block, and '72 or earlier 318 crank (steel & same stroke as a 340) buy aftermaket heads and make some serious HP.
Better design? Block is the same except the 340 has .040 more bore. Yeah, the early 340's had a steel crank but how many of Mom's cast cranks have you seen broken? Mains are bigger in a 360 tho...and if you want to play games, you can buy a longer rod for the longer stroke and end up with a better rod ratio in the 60. I've seen just as many hard running 360's as I have 340's....
 
Owned both, in the end the 360 wins hands down. As mentioned earlier, the piston to rod ratio can't be beat, even when you build it into a 408 which I currently own. Still smiling from the last time at the track..
 
Not trying to bash 360's here boys - I've had a few myself and I love 'em. In stock form I'd prefer a 340.
 
For the heavier B body in a cruiser car or lightly hot rodded, a 360 every time. The 340 is a looser in this case due to lack of torque.The 360 will make more torque and peak earlier in HP and very very near what a 340 makes.

Shorter stroke engines are always better at making HP. It is the lack of torque that they suck at no matter what company it is. This is where the longer stroke of the 360 is really nice. Since your rebuilding the engine, the piston prices are equal or a slight cheaper in many cases. The 4.00 bore is more popular across the big 3 company's. .04 in bore size is really very close to zip in HP. But .27 in stroke will show up on the butt dyno, the worst to be able to measure any power there is.



340 is a better design - short stroke/big bore. I'd rather have the better breathing capacity. Hell all you need is a 340 block, and '72 or earlier 318 crank (steel & same stroke as a 340) buy aftermaket heads and make some serious HP.

LOL, are you serious, what Cranky said below.

Better design? Block is the same except the 340 has .040 more bore. Yeah, the early 340's had a steel crank but how many of Mom's cast cranks have you seen broken? Mains are bigger in a 360 tho...and if you want to play games, you can buy a longer rod for the longer stroke and end up with a better rod ratio in the 60. I've seen just as many hard running 360's as I have 340's....

Any engine can be made to go fast, it is just a matter of cubic dollars.

How the heck is a 340's capacity to breath better than a 360? If ANYTHING, it is worse in a 340 at low RPM. At high RPM, (Where this is, is debatable. But we'll in general, call it racing RPM) the 340 is better. A light car should be used. Most B body cars are exempt from this in the street.

I wonder what kind of "Serious HP" you think he'll make with that basic recipe? I have seen cast crank run real well, hold over 550 hp and torque while lasting a long time measured over years.

If such is the case you'll make that the forged crank is stronger and worth to use it in a rebuild and follow your recipe, I want to know what heads your recommending him to use for over 550 HP? W9's?
 
Stock 340 vs. stock 360, the 340 makes more power all around. The man440 is right. The engine cam much more well prep'd to be ready to go.

Considering there is a huge lack of compression between the 2 engines to start matters off, hummm, I wonder what a honest equal ratio'd engine would do. As if, like a, "What if Ma MoPar did a HP 360 build like the 340 before everything started to change.
 
You can modify anything to improve it - in stock configuration, I'd take the 340, the bigger bore affords better breathing - period. Get more air in the cylinders - make more HP. Again, I'm not here to bash the good ole 360 I've got one in my 2000 RAM 2500 it has 120k miles on it, it is completely stock and it pulls the hell out my trailer.
 
Today, "340 or 360?" means NOTHING. It's dah mahn wut bilts dah MOTAH!
 
Who is "dah mahn" ?

I did not intend to single out any one individual. The meaning was that each engine will reflect the builders capabilities and not necessarily the engines original functional design ability.

Hoo dis gi? Fer dat U goht PM.
 
I did not intend to single out any one individual. The meaning was that each engine will reflect the builders capabilities and not necessarily the engines original functional design ability.

True, very true.:icon_thumright:

Hoo dis gi? Fer dat U goht PM.

Huh? Umm.. nevermind. Secrect Idaho talk, LOL! :headbang:
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top