Actually, the Europeans were building hemi's long before Chrysler got int he game.
appears single lifter per "set" of vales..that would be brutal punishment on the camshaft/lifter faces as the spring pressure from two valves of any performance quality whatsoever would be quite high...would suspect cam life to be short if car idled much in street application and if springs were compromised for the street..then do not think any serious high end would have resulted without floating..may wellhave been squashed to prevent future embarrassment..though GM has a goodly number of embarrassments as it is..
It partially depends on the stage of development. Obviously this was not a production engine and may have been the theory proving test in which case longevity is not a concern. If you prove the head design makes a huge improvement of the original head then you would move into a phase of designing a reliable cam/lifter arrangement and revise the block to match.Evidently you did not look at the valves on the head in the picture...good idea with poor execution is still my opinion..
appears single lifter per "set" of vales..that would be brutal punishment on the camshaft/lifter faces as the spring pressure from two valves of any performance quality whatsoever would be quite high.
Evidently you did not look at the valves on the head in the picture...good idea with poor execution is still my opinion..
I don't understand what you're getting at...sorry. What's to look at as to the valves on the head in the picture?
Valve sizes were: Intake 1.75" and Exhaust 1.375". Not the largest in the world...
By the way, there was an aluminum version of this engine developed for CAN-AM racing that actually ran and made it to the Lansing dyno rooms. With Weber carbs it made 700 hp. at 6800 rpm. The redline was 8500 rpm.
-=Photon440=-