__Larsson____
Well-Known Member
So i got a bag of a rear main seal Fel-Pro P95482-2 i can't for my life find any info about it if its for my Charger or my Jeep
Rear main seal parts number P95482-2
- Thread starter __Larsson____
- Start date
__Larsson____
Well-Known Member
Doubt it, cause the bag isnt even open =O and its says rear main seal and it isThe Fel-Pro P95482 2 is an engine oil pump gasket, specifically designed for use in 1954-1956 Mercury Custom vehicles.
Application: 1954-1956 Mercury Custom (Engine varies by year - 5.1L V8 for 1956, 4.8L V8 for 1955, and 4.2L V8 for 1954).
Just my $0.02...
I can't help but if it has a P followed by a number it is a MOPAR part.
BeepBeepRR
Well-Known Member
Old 80s Felpro catalog states MS 40240 for the rear main rubber seals. And BS 11748 for the rear rope seal. Pretty much the same numbers for all Big Block Mopars.
BeepBeepRR
Well-Known Member
Found this on the web... Link HERE to the posting. They are talking about a 308 Hudson but are also talking about 318 rear main seals. And making them work.
"The early (Fel-Pro P91055-1 winged) and the late (FP P95482-2) versions are dimensionally identical, however, the late "wingless" one has a double lip seal to provide a dust seal on the outboard side. I think it's important to note that the ends of either version aren't cut square on both ends. In both cases, the right hand end of the upper half and the left hand end of the lower are formed with an upward angle at the lip(s), presumably to assure sealing at the interface.
As pointed out by someone, I like to stagger the ends so that they don't align with the parting line of cap and block. It eliminates the possibility of pinching material at that point. It looks like the Hudson seal groove is correct for the Chrysler seal but I don't have a Chrysler on hand to check it. There's a little extra room in terms of thickness but I'm sure it's not an issue."
"The early (Fel-Pro P91055-1 winged) and the late (FP P95482-2) versions are dimensionally identical, however, the late "wingless" one has a double lip seal to provide a dust seal on the outboard side. I think it's important to note that the ends of either version aren't cut square on both ends. In both cases, the right hand end of the upper half and the left hand end of the lower are formed with an upward angle at the lip(s), presumably to assure sealing at the interface.
As pointed out by someone, I like to stagger the ends so that they don't align with the parting line of cap and block. It eliminates the possibility of pinching material at that point. It looks like the Hudson seal groove is correct for the Chrysler seal but I don't have a Chrysler on hand to check it. There's a little extra room in terms of thickness but I'm sure it's not an issue."
Similar threads
