• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Uh oh, the NRA may be in trouble

Gone

Well-Known Member
Local time
12:59 PM
Joined
Dec 31, 2012
Messages
9,010
Reaction score
19,947
Location
USA
Pulled this off of the Drudge Report. It's a Rolling Stones magazine article:

The NRA Says It’s in Deep Financial Trouble, May Be ‘Unable to Exist’
A new legal filing by the powerful gun group against the state of New York paints a grim picture
Tim Dickinson August 3, 2018 11:10AM ET

The National Rifle Association warns that it is in grave financial jeopardy, according to a recent court filing obtained by Rolling Stone, and that it could soon “be unable to exist… or pursue its advocacy mission.” (Read the NRA’s legal complaint at the bottom of this story.)

The reason, according to the NRA filing, is not its deep entanglement with alleged Russian agents like Maria Butina. Instead, the gun group has been suing New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the state’s financial regulators since May, claiming the NRA has been subject to a state-led “blacklisting campaign” that has inflicted “tens of millions of dollars in damages.”

In the new document — an amended complaint filed in U.S. District Court in late July — the NRA says it cannot access financial services essential to its operations and is facing “irrecoverable loss and irreparable harm.”

Specifically, the NRA warns that it has lost insurance coverage — endangering day-to-day operations. “Insurance coverage is necessary for the NRA to continue its existence,” the complaint reads. Without general liability coverage, it adds, the “NRA cannot maintain its physical premises, convene off-site meetings and events, operate educational programs … or hold rallies, conventions and assemblies.” The complaint says the NRA’s video streaming service and magazines may soon shut down.

“The NRA’s inability to obtain insurance in connection with media liability raises risks that are especially acute; if insurers remain afraid to transact with the NRA, there is a substantial risk that NRATV will be forced to cease operating.” The group also warns it “could be forced to cease circulation of various print publications and magazines.”

In addition to its insurance troubles, the NRA court filing also claims that “abuses” by Cuomo and the New York State Department of Financial Services “will imminently deprive the NRA of basic bank-depository services … and other financial services essential to the NRA’s corporate existence.”

The lawsuit presents these financial risks as catastrophic. Without access to routine banking services, the NRA claims, “it will be unable to exist as a not-for-profit or pursue its advocacy mission.” The lawsuit accuses New York’s government of seeking to “silence one of America’s oldest constitutional rights advocates,” pleading to the court: “If their abuses are not enjoined, they will soon, substantially, succeed.”

The lawsuit stems from actions taken by New York financial regulators to halt the sale of an illegal, NRA-branded insurance policy. The NRA actively marketed “Carry Guard,” a policy to reimburse members for legal costs incurred after firing a legal gun. In May, the state of New York found that Carry Guard “unlawfully provided liability insurance to gun owners for certain acts of intentional wrongdoing.” The NRA’s insurance partners agreed to stop selling the policies and pay a $7 million fine.

The NRA complaint alleges that New York was not content to block this single insurance product, but instead campaigned to sever the NRA’s ties to a wide range of financial service providers, from insurance companies to banks.

The NRA did not respond to a request for more detail about its financial distress, but its most recent financial disclosure also shows it overspent by nearly $46 million in 2016.

The lawsuit decries pressure from state regulators in the wake of the Parkland, Florida massacre — including a letter asking financial institutions to heed “the voices of the passionate, courageous, and articulate young people who have experienced this recent horror first hand” — and from the governor himself. In April, Cuomo tweeted: “I urge companies in New York State to revisit any ties they have to the NRA and consider their reputations, and responsibility to the public.”

In its complaint, the NRA paints these actions as a “malicious conspiracy to stifle the NRA’s speech and induce a boycott of the NRA.” Cuomo and state regulators, the NRA alleges, were intent on “suppressing the NRA’s pro-Second Amendment viewpoint” and had engaged in “unlawful conduct with the intent to obstruct, chill, deter, and retaliate against the NRA’s core political speech.”

In the filing, the NRA reveals that its longtime insurer broke off negotiations this winter and “stated that it was unwilling to renew coverage at any price.” [Emphasis in original.] The NRA claims it “has encountered serious difficulties obtaining corporate insurance coverage to replace coverage withdrawn.” In addition, the NRA contends that “multiple banks” have now balked at doing business with it “based on concerns that any involvement with the NRA — even providing the organization with basic depository services — would expose them to regulatory reprisals.”

The lawsuit seeks an immediate injunction to block state authorities from “interfering with, terminating, or diminishing any of the NRA’s contracts and/or business relationships with any organizations.” Without court intervention, the complaint reads, “the NRA will suffer irrecoverable loss and irreparable harm if it is unable to acquire insurance or other banking services due to Defendants’ actions.”

Cuomo also did not respond to a request for comment, but has previously waved off the NRA’s lawsuit as “a futile and desperate attempt to advance its dangerous agenda to sell more guns.”
 
Last edited:
Well, I’m a life member and have only heard kinda fringe stuff on the above. The firearms nationwide aren’t going away anytime soon. I think it’s more the banks refusing firearm dealers,etc. the wherewithal to financing for everyday operations.
 
I read the same thing today
some of "the sources" they name in that article
are not the most trust worthy,
that lean in a different political direction too...

Don't believe it, unless you hear it,
from the NRA themselves

Lifetime member here too...
 
They can kill off the name but they might not like what happens if you have people in a corner and say you have two options they might not like option 3
 
I was wondering whats the NRA's position on these non metal handguns that I've read about. They can be made off of some kind of printer?
Also what have they said about this Russian spy Maria Butina? Im sure there involvement with her wasn't intentional but have they released any official statements about her?
 
OK, did some checking on the NRA-ILA website. They reference the lawsuit in a few articles but I couldn't find anything that suggests that they are in trouble, so I'm relieved. I'm just wary because I know the Left is relentless in their attempts to destroy this American institution. Also a Lifetime member.

For SFSI about 3D guns, here's the NRA position per the NRA-ILA website:

FAIRFAX, Va.— Chris W. Cox, executive director, National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action, released the following statement on Tuesday [31 July 2018]:

“Many anti-gun politicians and members of the media have wrongly claimed that 3-D printing technology will allow for the production and widespread proliferation of undetectable plastic firearms. Regardless of what a person may be able to publish on the Internet, undetectable plastic guns have been illegal for 30 years. Federal law passed in 1988, crafted with the NRA’s support, makes it unlawful to manufacture, import, sell, ship, deliver, possess, transfer, or receive an undetectable firearm.”
 
I cannot believe that the far left Democrats have to throw in some BS nonsense about 3D guns....Goes to show they have no flipping clue of the laws in place and all they want to do is come up with BS to agitate, piss off and cause drama....

So sick of people spreading nonsense with zero facts.....
 
God Bless The NRA!!! Remember, that damn George Soros also lives in New York State somewhere. He backs all the antigun stuff and always has! The S.O.B.!
 
The NRA isn't broke....FAKE NEWS.

This is "in general" the type of fake stuff that Russia (& probably others) are trying to split up the people of the USA with...seriously. This "fake news" divides Republican & Democrat AMERICANS from each other...just like the hype about 3D guns.
FAKE NEWS --> Democrats are bankrupting the NRA
FAKE NEWS --> Republicans want to give terrorists plastic guns
Who wins? the Russians
Who loses? AMERICANS
 
Last edited:
I cannot believe that the far left Democrats have to throw in some BS nonsense about 3D guns....Goes to show they have no flipping clue of the laws in place and all they want to do is come up with BS to agitate, piss off and cause drama....

So sick of people spreading nonsense with zero facts.....
This is literally what they think happens

FCC99917-8119-4195-B750-A9A01D3AB546.jpeg
 
Rolling Stones was rolling too many blunts. They never had much legitimacy, but since going "mainstream" political they lost what little journalistic credibility they had left. Of course, that seems to be a thing of the past, anyway. R.I.P.
 
I ain't worried at all really. Member myself. Should it go away, I always have the Constitution to fall back on. That will never be taken away. And should anyone attempt to usurp it then Katy Bar The Door as I am more than will to use option #3 as mentioned above...cr8crshr/Tuck:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::usflag::usflag::usflag:
 
Last edited:
Just rejoined last year heard something about not being able to do magazine subscription, online only probably.
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top