XEO1-
Well-Known Member
The only way to survive with no power is to have a secondary hand pump,water turbine pump from a flowing water fall(most likely a place to find a super bunker is at at its secondary)
the best bet to build a bunker is of course building a river bed under ground from a lake source directly to the central filtration system.
We still don’t have the technology to understand how fish breath so we have to include this advancement one day in verapas-for mile long or longer river ravines that a machine can scrub the h20 oxygen out of.
Out west is usually a terrible place to build a bunker-unless areas for water flourish underground in dark dank space and loneliness waiting to be brighten up by artificial lights- it makes a interesting conversation for possible bunker investiture when finding a huge underground water source.
underground water sources are a perspective of mine I Joscil down on paper coming to a hypothetical conclusion that it’s a perfect location…..
But how did they find it and why is still a mystery..
But for that mystery I do know Manual pumps will be a deciding factor in air ventilation in many lives.
Back to the article thesis thou.
how to find a nuclear grade bunker is by direct hit math is by taking the xyz of the direct implosion and adding thr force through a particular rock bed(rock bed is a must investigative side at finding a military bunker-it will not be weak sentiment layers.
That hurts the liquid erosion theory of southern super bunker zones down by New Orleans harder to find but leading to a interesting thought if military scientist found a strong area in hundreds of swaure miles to build one at.
But Math in entrances is crucial at understanding how the personnel will beable to get out of a direct hit installation-it won’t be mountainous,it won’t be flat-it will be valleys mostly likely I guess-the impact is different.
Usually I’d say military bases are located at valleys. Valleys are crucial at understanding flow when a direct hit happens it’s snake like figure goes up and down up and down making top room for a installation to get out of thr debris.
the best bet to build a bunker is of course building a river bed under ground from a lake source directly to the central filtration system.
We still don’t have the technology to understand how fish breath so we have to include this advancement one day in verapas-for mile long or longer river ravines that a machine can scrub the h20 oxygen out of.
Out west is usually a terrible place to build a bunker-unless areas for water flourish underground in dark dank space and loneliness waiting to be brighten up by artificial lights- it makes a interesting conversation for possible bunker investiture when finding a huge underground water source.
underground water sources are a perspective of mine I Joscil down on paper coming to a hypothetical conclusion that it’s a perfect location…..
But how did they find it and why is still a mystery..
But for that mystery I do know Manual pumps will be a deciding factor in air ventilation in many lives.
Back to the article thesis thou.
how to find a nuclear grade bunker is by direct hit math is by taking the xyz of the direct implosion and adding thr force through a particular rock bed(rock bed is a must investigative side at finding a military bunker-it will not be weak sentiment layers.
That hurts the liquid erosion theory of southern super bunker zones down by New Orleans harder to find but leading to a interesting thought if military scientist found a strong area in hundreds of swaure miles to build one at.
But Math in entrances is crucial at understanding how the personnel will beable to get out of a direct hit installation-it won’t be mountainous,it won’t be flat-it will be valleys mostly likely I guess-the impact is different.
Usually I’d say military bases are located at valleys. Valleys are crucial at understanding flow when a direct hit happens it’s snake like figure goes up and down up and down making top room for a installation to get out of thr debris.
