• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

BB Edelbrock intake

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sedanman

Well-Known Member
Local time
6:02 AM
Joined
Apr 13, 2011
Messages
332
Reaction score
80
Location
Chicago
Feedback: 1 / 0 / 0
Contact seller
This is an Edelbrock CH4B with Chrysler pt #2836150 (discontinued). It's in pretty good shape with no stripped threads & has never been ported. I couldn't find the part # in my books to tell which BB it's from though. $125+ ship obo
PM me if interested
 

Attachments

  • Picture 022.jpg
    Picture 022.jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 361
  • Picture 023.jpg
    Picture 023.jpg
    61.4 KB · Views: 356
  • Picture 020.jpg
    Picture 020.jpg
    67.2 KB · Views: 318
  • Picture 021.jpg
    Picture 021.jpg
    65.2 KB · Views: 316
Last edited:
That is an RB series BB intake which fits all 413, 440 and 426 CI engines.
 
I found this info on it:
This intake has been out of production for years but retains a loyal following. Once Edelbrock's premier two-plane intake, it also sold through Mopar's Direct Connection program back in the day and is well remembered by old-time Mopar enthusiasts


The CH4B is similar in look and layout to the stock intake, and is a relatively low profile design. The numbers showed a substantial improvement compared to the stocker over most of the range tested, particularly higher up in the range. Interestingly, peak horsepower occurred very high in the rpm range with the CH4B, equaled only by the new Victor. It tended to favor higher rpm performance and was kind of soft at the bottom of the range. The averages were quite good among the other two planes, well ahead of the stocker. No wonder people remember this as a good intake.


The Intake: Edelbrock #2290 CH4B
Type: Aluminum Two-Plane Four-Barrel
Rated rpm Range: 1,500-5,500N/A

The CH4B is similar in look and layout to the stock intake, and is a relatively low profile design. The numbers showed a substantial improvement compared to the stocker over most of the range tested, particularly higher up in the range. Interestingly, peak horsepower occurred very high in the rpm range with the CH4B. It tended to favor higher rpm performance and was kind of soft at the bottom of the range. The averages were quite good among the other two planes, well ahead of the stocker. No wonder people remember this as a good intake.
From MM magazine
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top