In what?Is there a way to bypass the dash amp gauge without having to tear the dash apart? Can it be bypassed on the engine side of the bulkhead connector?
69 440 gtxIn what?
If it’s a non AC car you should be able to reach up under the dash and disconnect them from the amp gauge and connect them together. Make sure to disconnect the battery first and insulate the connection well to avoid having it ground out. You can’t do it from the engine side as you need to be able to get to the dash harness side of the wiring to jump out the amp gauge.69 440 gtx
You beat me to it! 8^}If it’s a non AC car you should be able to reach up under the dash and disconnect them from the amp gauge and connect them together. Make sure to disconnect the battery first and insulate the connection well to avoid having it ground out. You can’t do it from the engine side as you need to be able to get to the dash harness side of the wiring to jump out the amp gauge.
It's an ac car, zero room to see the back of the dashIf it’s a non AC car you should be able to reach up under the dash and disconnect them from the amp gauge and connect them together. Make sure to disconnect the battery first and insulate the connection well to avoid having it ground out. You can’t do it from the engine side as you need to be able to get to the dash harness side of the wiring to jump out the amp gauge.
What’s the concern with the ammeter? The Packard terminals in the charge path bulkhead connector are by far the weakest link in the original design. The earlier screw terminals pictured above are a better design but would not apply to a ’69. Better off bypassing the Packards or doing the fleet bypass.Is there a way to bypass the dash amp gauge without having to tear the dash apart? Can it be bypassed on the engine side of the bulkhead connector?
To be clear, alternators don't "push" any amps, the amount of current flowing at any given time is determined by the current draw of the loads. On a healthy correctly loaded stock system there will be little to no current flowing through the ammeter (needle centered) while running as long as the alternator can cover all running loads... Especially since so many alternators now push 100 amps.
To be clear, alternators don't "push" any amps, the amount of current flowing at any given time is determined by the current draw of the loads. On a healthy correctly loaded stock system there will be little to no current flowing through the ammeter (needle centered) while running as long as the alternator can cover all running loads.
My amp meter has been acting erratic for the last month. Reading high, then reading nothing, then reading Discharge then reading normal. When I read the charge with a meter, the voltage output is steady and consistent while the amp meter is moving around. The vr is new, the alternator is new and the engine side wiring is new. I do have an 8 gauge wire running directly from the alternator to the starter relay (with a fusable link)What’s the concern with the ammeter? The Packard terminals in the charge path bulkhead connector are by far the weakest link in the original design. The earlier screw terminals pictured above are a better design but would not apply to a ’69. Better off bypassing the Packards or doing the fleet bypass.
To be clear, alternators don't "push" any amps, the amount of current flowing at any given time is determined by the current draw of the loads. On a healthy correctly loaded stock system there will be little to no current flowing through the ammeter (needle centered) while running as long as the alternator can cover all running loads.
Yikes, that’s what’s become known as the “shunt wire” bypass, very dangerous for an all-stock system as it circumvents the designed circuit protection for all stock unfused wiring. With it in place it will also disable most of any ammeter response as charging current is routed across the shunt wire. If the ammeter moves significantly with the shunt wire in place, it’s responding the load current or resistance at load related connections. Again, I’d be looking at the Packard’s in the bulkhead closely. There is a great deal of ammeter/electrical information posted here, do a search on ammeters.... I do have an 8 gauge wire running directly from the alternator to the starter relay (with a fusable link)
The added 8 guage wire also has a fusable link...Yikes, that’s what’s become known as the “shunt wire” bypass, verry dangerous for an all- stock system as it circumvents the designed circuit protection for all stock unfused wiring. With it in place it will also disable most of any ammeter response as charging current is routed across the shunt wire. If the ammeter moves significantly with the shunt wire in place, it’s responding the load current or resistance at load related connections. Again, I’d be looking at the Packard’s in the bulkhead closely. There is a great deal of ammeter/electrical information posted here, do a search on ammeters.
DDG, really? Did you pay attention to his disclaimer at the beginning of his most recent video promoting this “fix”, where he states “I’m not exactly a trained expert in the field of automotive electrical”? The presence of a fusible link on the shunt wire changes the situation by little, still removes/bypasses the adequate amount of circuit protection for the all the stock unfused wiring, increasing the level of current flowing in the event of a short by paralleling (or shunting) the stock fusible link well beyond the point where the stock 12ga wires burn, look up Kirchhoff’s current law and the current divider rule. Mr. Attwood would be DDG wrong in this regard, read some of the comments in his most recent YouTube video where he pushes this dangerous “fix”.The added 8 guage wire also has a fusable link...
This is a common mod recommended by Dead Dodge Garage
DDG, really? Did you pay attention to his disclaimer at the beginning of his most recent video promoting this “fix”, where he states “I’m not exactly a trained expert in the field of automotive electrical”? The presence of a fusible link on the shunt wire changes the situation by little, still removes/bypasses the adequate amount of circuit protection for the all the stock unfused wiring, increasing the level of current flowing in the event of a short by paralleling (or shunting) the stock fusible link well beyond the point where the stock 12ga wires burn, look up Kirchhoff’s current law and the current divider rule. Mr. Attwood would be DDG wrong in this regard, read some of the comments in his most recent YouTube video where he pushes this dangerous “fix”.
Someone has challenged this particular misinformation in his own format.