What's on the front Ed. It just looks "Good".
68 plymouth, I moved my rear axle.
- Thread starter dana44
- Start date
MoparLeo
NRA BENEFACTOR LEVEL LIFE MEMBER
- Local time
- 3:23 AM
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2015
- Messages
- 2,470
- Reaction score
- 2,695
- Location
- Moreno Valley, So California
2 main problems, Too much negative offset on the rear wheels, worn out springs, high school rear shackles ( dangerous on a hard swerve or corner.) Shocks will be the wrong stroke as well.
Change the rims, re-arch the springs to the height you need. Solved.
Change the rims, re-arch the springs to the height you need. Solved.
100%. I've had some shackle cars..
The factory kept them short and strong, with shouldered bolts , to keep them structurally square and solid.
70s shackles are ..
dana44
Well-Known Member
I have new springs on it, read the whole part as I moved to the highest point on the shackles.
68-70 B Bodies never liked 10" wide wheels. 8's look good.
dana44
Well-Known Member
Highest
dana44
Well-Known Member
You read that part with I ordered new springs? Dose this look "gutted" to you? Asking for a friend.
- Local time
- 3:23 AM
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2012
- Messages
- 41,271
- Reaction score
- 155,781
- Location
- Granite Bay CA
These are 11" wide on the outside, 10" between the beads.
They fit inside the quarter panels and don't rub.
- Local time
- 3:23 AM
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2012
- Messages
- 41,271
- Reaction score
- 155,781
- Location
- Granite Bay CA
You are getting defensive.
If you are annoyed with some members that are not understanding you, it would help if you wrote a bit clearer. Take a look at other member's build threads to see how to better communicate what you have done.
The members here love a good story on how a man builds his car.
Good luck with the car.
Last edited:
- Local time
- 6:23 AM
- Joined
- May 14, 2011
- Messages
- 18,822
- Reaction score
- 37,693
- Location
- On the Ridge, TN
I was displaying how the wheel is located in the wheelwell for you actually...
along with how the car sits fully dressed out with weight.
- Local time
- 6:23 AM
- Joined
- May 14, 2011
- Messages
- 18,822
- Reaction score
- 37,693
- Location
- On the Ridge, TN
BB BELLA
Well-Known Member
built this when I was 15 had it ready to roll when I got my license,actually took it to my driving test [examiner wouldn't get in it], biggest shackles I could find,air shocks with 3" extentions,n50-14's on 14x10's and didn't know much about anything other than what I liked! old school yup and certainly not a sleeper look!
hunt2elk
Well-Known Member
68-70 B bodies like 10" wheels just fine. Just need the backspacing dead nuts....
dana44
Well-Known Member
Yes! That's a good look.
15x8's and L60's
dana44
Well-Known Member
Thats a good-looking stance!
skicker
Well-Known Member
- Local time
- 6:23 AM
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2011
- Messages
- 1,426
- Reaction score
- 3,524
- Location
- Cumberland, Maryland
That is about where my car sat as it was going together after paint...
Only real difference is 275/60/15's are a good bit shorter than 275/60/17's...
I have SS springs on mine and it was just too high for me...
After the back glass went in I added 1" lowering blocks and it was about right...
3 years later I added about 200# of stereo equipment it went down some more...
Wheel offset in combination with actual tread width is the key to making one look like it is really stuffed with tires...
My rear wheels are 17" x 9.5" with 5.5" backspacing...
That is what worked well with a tire that has an 11.25" section width...
A narrower rear tire can use a wider wheel...
If a high stance is all you want as long as nothing rubs a lot of this doesn't matter...
dana44
Well-Known Member
I would like to with a bigger tire, but the selection is slim for 15s without it being a soft compound race tire. Not to mention the money factor.
You are correct,
275/60/15 = 27.99x10.83
275/60/17 = 29.99x10.83
both with the same side wall Hight of 6.5''
You are correct,
275/60/15 = 27.99x10.83
275/60/17 = 29.99x10.83
both with the same side wall Hight of 6.5''
Similar threads
