moparjohnny
Well-Known Member
Which one was the open chamber heads?close chamber give off more emission,so give me your experience or opinion. Car will be a torque flite with a little shift kit,3.55 gear,mild cam. 67 coronet.
Actually, too tight of a quench area will contribute to higher HC emissions. This is because the flame front can't get in that space to burn all the fuel. I believe the open chamber head was developed for this reason - to get the flame front in to burn everything - but at the expense of compression. Quench is good, and one of the perks of a wedge design chamber, but it must be done properly.
It is also a fact that putting the top compression ring higher on the piston reduces that small annular clearance around the piston head, thus reducing the volume of fuel that can't be sufficiently burned. This is also why the hypereutectic alloy was used to make pistons in the later years because the stronger alloy allows for a higher ring placement. My 78 440 block in the green Bel has huge bore chamfers (responsible for a .4 point of compression loss) and I believe this was done to open up that area around the piston head to try and get the flame front in to burn all the fuel. Burning all the fuel in the chamber is a pretty darn good idea to make power. You just need to increase the compression ratio while not destroying the dynamic of the chamber. Late model engines do this very well.
- - - Updated - - -
The 906 head was the first "emissions" head and I believe is one of the best production heads to use next to the closed chamber 915. Both have the same intake port shape. The popularity of the later heads only came from the need to supply the masses because usable 915 and 906 heads were disappearing. Sure the flow in CFM can be equal between all the iron heads but I think the magic is in the WAY the mixture flows around the corner into the valve pocket. Of course the hemi solves that problem!
Keepin um tuned will go a long way towards bein green.