Looks like a sports car to me.

He needs the large oil cooler for the 110 hP per liter screaming air cooled flat six out back!Boy -o-boy, that air intake doesn't blend too well with the shape of the 911. That's my industrial design side talking.
My undergrad is in design, my MS is in petroleum geology. I switched careers back and forth depending on the price of oil.
I'm in total agreement on the '68 GTX, with a few select '69 models in the same league for me, based on color combinations. My first GTX was a '70 model because I couldn't find a '68 for sale at any price in 1977. I felt like I won the lottery when I owned Baby Blue and my Hemi car at the same time.View attachment 1944042
Most beautiful muscle car I desired was the 1968 GTX.
I looked for years in Texas for a '68 GTX (preferably a Hemi) and didn't find any before stumbling across the '70 Charger I purchased in 1985.

Makes sense to me, when you came of driving age, that's how most of them looked. I'm a bit older, and when I was 16, most of them were still running same size tires, with the original owners, seems to explain why I've leaned toward stock appearance. On the other hand, the few '68s I saw in the wild during that period all wore Magnum 500s or torque thrusts, no dog dishes or wheel covers.I prefer mine sitting a bit higher and slightly raked.......with a set of fatties out back![]()
It had a special packaged name as a musclecar. The mopars were just sedans with large engines.I never understood how the 64 GTO get all the credit for the so called first musclecar. The 62,63 413's and 64 426's could whoop any GTO all day long.
And the quickest production car you could buy.It had a special packaged name as a musclecar. The mopars were just sedans with large engines.