• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

What caused this camshaft wear pattern

Your lifters may not have been rotating. The cam will partially rotate a lifter with every stroke. This must happen or you will get cam wear. Check lifters in the bores and see if there were any burrs or issues there. Without a cam in the block, they should just glide right through the bore and out the other side. The lifter bores in an engine are CRITICAL to making sure a flat tappet cam lives.
 
It was broke in with driven breakin oil and mostly valvoline vr1 10-30 oil. I think I did one oil change with amsoil 10/30 high zinc oil. Filters were wix . Ive never seen a failure like this. Im going to a solid roller and I want to make sure my bases are covered.
Cam or lifters are not machined properly; there is no rotation of the lifter. I have seen this on dozens of engines last couple of years. You can use any oil you want but on a flat tappet cam if the lifter does not spin on the cam lobe as it rotates it will simply not last. And I made the same decision you did several years ago, just run a roller and be done with it.
 
Ill contact comp and see what they say. It already out. Its going to be disassembled inspected cleaned and reassembled. It going back together with a bullet solid roller

View attachment 1969681

Please post pictures of the bottom of those 2 lifters on the lobes in question when you have it apart.
I don’t think the wear pattern across the top is really the concern here, just the chips correct? Which would be core manufacturing issues, debris or something. Regardless, yes it needs changed for sure.
 
Last edited:
Yup....don't forget to use the correct intermediate shaft with a roller....solid or hydraulic.
 
@4mulas

10 out of 16 lobes look like these 2. All lifter bores passed the Hughes thunk test. Ive ordered the burnished ball for them anyway.
I did a quick measure with a caliper and all the lobes are between. .005 - .007 short of spec.

Screenshot_20251231_135408_Gallery.jpg


Screenshot_20251231_135258_Gallery.jpg
 
What are the spring pressures?
Rocker ratio?

Fundamentally, I feel like the load was concentrated on that failed area, the core got excessively work hardened, until pieces started breaking off/flaking away.
Could it be as simple as the core just wasn’t up to the task? Of course that’s a possibility.

One of the pitfalls of fast rate FT cams with high lifts are they have a smaller nose radius.
Smaller nose radius = less area to spread the load over

Was it nitrided?
 
@4mulas

10 out of 16 lobes look like these 2. All lifter bores passed the Hughes thunk test. Ive ordered the burnished ball for them anyway.
I did a quick measure with a caliper and all the lobes are between. .005 - .007 short of spec.

View attachment 1971007

View attachment 1971008
Usually it’s lifter failure and not cam failure. Well the bad lifter usually makes the cam fail, lol. I haven’t seen that light chunking pitting going on with your cam before. The lifters look ok. And the wear pattern in cam not bad to me anyway. But I’m sure others know more than me.
 
It was a comp xe285hl with comps lifters and springs. I was chasing a valvetrain noise and went to a slightly heavier spring. I went from a comp comp 924-16 112 seat 355 open. To a TF16893-16 120 seat and 394 open. An increase of about 50lbs spring rate. In the end the actual noise was the cam gear coming loose because I failed to locktite the bolt. Ugh! No it wasn't nitrided.
 
Back
Top