Mike Gaines
Well-Known Member
- Local time
- 9:47 PM
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2014
- Messages
- 2,098
- Reaction score
- 4,297
- Location
- Ahwahnee, (Fresno) California
Mr.LemonWedge:I search the internet on a nearly daily basis for 63-65 race cars. Surprising I’ve never seen this one. Musta been hidden away somewhere.
Mr.LemonWedge:
Clear out your inbox so I can send you a bBody message...thanks, Mike
PS: This car I just bought was NOT listed on the internet.
The very back is square tube going across that the round tubes are tied into. Car weighs 3100 empty...but....it has steel front and rear bumpers and the only fiberglass on the car is the hood and deck lid. All the windows are glass (roll up and down) and the interior of the doors have NOT been gutted. Car could be lighter with merely glass bumpers.mike i have been looking at the pictures of your new car. very nice!. is the rear frame rail round tube or box ?. I can see the front to rear connector is round tube but cant tell what the back is. I know when I was building my car the weight savings between the two was significant. I went with the box tube because I felt it would be stronger in a bigger body car. my car ended up weighing 3088 with no driver. I watched dvw's build and other and with some of my own tricks for weight loss ideas. i dont know your plans are for the engine. but the intake on that engine was not a very good race intake. my street car would lose about three tenth's when I would put it on. the m 1 and a single 800 afb would go faster. have fun and keep us updated.
No history because it is a brand new build. Only 48 mile on the new AutoMeter odometer when I bought it. In one of my other posts I shared that made 3 passes with the car last weekend just to check things out. Car went low 12's at 110-111mph.Any racing history on the car? Best et?