The Hemis weren't readily available in the beginning in '64, as Ski and 33 IMP said. The cracked blocks at Daytona were replaced by one of the engineers driving a new truck load down to Daytona from Detroit at the 11th hour.
That is a reasonable bet. But the all of the 8 losing mopars in 1963, the best finishing car was RP in 6th, why would any of the 12 Mopars in 1964 at the first race Daytona 500 choose a Stage 3 proven loser when the Hemi cars were running circles around everyone else. I would bet at least 8 of the 12 Mopars in the 500 had Hemi's. They would not have gotten the driving talent they got with a Stage 3 motor. I see can't see any apparent advantage of a RB wedge over a Hemi on a short track.And I'll bet that not every team was given new Hemi's. And I'll bet not every team could afford a bunch of new hemis if they weren't on the freebies list.
And a wedge just might have been just as competitive on a short track.
Yeah, I'm talking on the Street...Nascar I believe had a min weight at that time, and total weight back then I suspect mattered less than weight distribution, meaning whose car was lighter meant little on the banked ovals. Car size because of aero did matter as they were discovering at that time. The Hemi was probably the heaviest engine at that time.
Yeah, that is (was) the point...Heck...the 440 Six Pack properly tuned in street version gave some Hemi Guys fits...And I'll bet that not every team was given new Hemi's. And I'll bet not every team could afford a bunch of new hemis if they weren't on the freebies list.
And a wedge just might have been just as competitive on a short track.
I think a hi-riser 427 Ford head would be comparable to a max.The Pontiac head wasn't superior at the time. For sure the block lifter bores were weaker. So why did they win? Aero, cheater cubes? Certainly a SD Pontiac head didn't match a Max Wedge head. Neither did a FE or a 409. So why were the the Max Wedges slower?
Doug