• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

ATI Harmonic Balancer: Honing to Fit Stock Crankshaft

LSS&B

Well-Known Member
Local time
12:27 AM
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Messages
216
Reaction score
273
Location
Aylett, VA
I installed an AR224 Timing Cover on 1966 440 engine. It has stock depth.
AR Engineering says "Works with Fluidamper FLU720311 $519.49 or ATI 917122E $377.99 Harmonic Balancer." Mancini Prices
I have seen some older comments about ATI Harmonic Balancer requiring honing at a machine shop to achieve correct internal diameter to install on a stock crankshaft.
Is this still true?
If so, is there a quality damper that is bolt-on and price competitive to ATI? Thanks
ATI Standard Harmonic Balancer
1765903231149.png
 
I installed the same damper on my 426W a few years back. It was a tight fit, but it went on OK using the balanccer bolt with washer. One thing to know though, your bottom pully will not be in the stock location (allignment) with your other pullies. Any where from 1/8 to 3/8 inch offset. I uesd a Ford pully to compenstate.
 
I hit the crank snout with emery cloth and the balancer with a wheel cylinder hone. Made the install easier. You’ll need to put something in the keyway for honing.

The ATI 917470E is the correct balancer for the pulleys to line-up.
 
I have had to hone a lot of different brand balancers usually on new cranks. If it is an OEM crank most of the time they will go on. One thing to think about is If it is going on tight with an installation tool, many times you might be rolling metal from either the balancer or the crank and you will push those cuttings into the oil pan and many times never know it.
to answer your question, you just have to buy one then and measure and try it.
 
In the old days you got a Mopar balancer and it fit. How simple. The spec was .0005"-.0015" interference fit and everything was fine. ATI is supposed to be the best so I use them. I think they make them too small, then you can't return them because they don't fit. They just tell you to hone it. ATI calls for .0007"-.0009" interference fit. You have to have some pretty good measuring equipment for that. And even if you know someone with a Sunnen hone, the keyway mandrel to do it costs $500. Nothings easy nowadays. I prefer the 1970's.
 
We measure and if needed hone to fit. It doesn't matter if it is Pro Race, Powerbond, Pioneer, TCI, ATI or other. Sometimes they all need a quick hone job.
 
I use the Dulcich method. He uses a flapper paper roll, and sizes it by spinning it with the drill while holding it against the bench grinder. He explained the method in person to me and it worked perfectly. No need to compensate for the groove. Went on smoothly and that engine makes over 1k rwhp with no issues in 3 years. Balancer went on with proper tool.
 
I hit the crank snout with emery cloth and the balancer with a wheel cylinder hone. Made the install easier. You’ll need to put something in the keyway for honing.

The ATI 917470E is the correct balancer for the pulleys to line-up.
Thanks for the part number!
I checked Summit https://www.summitracing.com/parts/ati-917470e
No problem with price.
What did you put in keyway to use wheel cylinder hone?
Also, the reviews site problems with the T-40 Torx pulley attaching bolts. I have the socket tool. Did you have any issues with these bolts?
 
Back
Top