• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Boeing 747 vs Boeing 787

More engines is always better in a plane.
Engines Turn Or People Swim.
 
In 1980, the 787, 777, 767, and 757 didn't exist. If it had an upper deck and 4 engines, it was a 747. Four engines and narrow-body? 707. Three engines & large? DC-10 or L-1011. Three engines and small? 727. Two engines and small? 737.
 
Last edited:
If I remember correctly the 747 was a four speed


Yup,
the "Newer" 747-300 has overdrive but ALL 747s are manual shift...
The "Dreamliner" has only automatic....
One of my old bud's was one of the Flight test Pilots on the Dreamliner...
It is un-believable!
All plastic...not carbon fiber...no rivets...seamless and super high tech....
Boeing performed hundreds of test Flights here at Edwards AFB on the 787
 
Circa 1980 I flew with mom on a four Island tour of Hawaii from California. I think the aircraft was a 747, but not sure. Never been on a 787.


Too bad you don't have a photo of the plane, either inside or out. That would be helpful. :)
Whatever plane it was, it had more than two engines. It wasn't until after 1985 that the FAA started to allow longer over water flights with twins. Prior to that, ETOPS rules meant that in case of an engine failure, aircraft operating on one engine had to be no more than 90 minutes from a landing site.
 
^^^Which is why I have no compunctions or issues about flying on a twin engine commercial or military jet anywhere.
 
Back
Top