Lazerwolf
Well-Known Member
Doing a little research on tuning my carburetor, I found this article.
http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/1202phr-10-biggest-carb-mistakes/
One thing that struck me odd was a statement in there on carb adapters.
Edelbrock’s Stinson says: “If the customer has a spread-bore like a GM intake that a Q-jet came off of, we’d recommend a number 2697 adapter kit.”
I currently run an Edelbrock square bore carb on an Edelbrock Performer manifold (spread bore), as probably many of us do. The adapter he is talking about is a square bore carb mount to spread bore manifold. I just use the 1/8"(?) metal adapter plate, with a 1/2" composite spacer. I'm well aware of the heat transfer, so please ignore the aluminum/composite issue. My question is with the vacuum sucking the air/fuel mixture down into the manifold, would you really get any benefit from this type of adapter? It would seem like better airflow in theory but it's not increasing volume of air or fuel. Would just like your opinion on this. Just a gimic?
http://www.hotrod.com/how-to/engine/1202phr-10-biggest-carb-mistakes/
One thing that struck me odd was a statement in there on carb adapters.
Edelbrock’s Stinson says: “If the customer has a spread-bore like a GM intake that a Q-jet came off of, we’d recommend a number 2697 adapter kit.”
I currently run an Edelbrock square bore carb on an Edelbrock Performer manifold (spread bore), as probably many of us do. The adapter he is talking about is a square bore carb mount to spread bore manifold. I just use the 1/8"(?) metal adapter plate, with a 1/2" composite spacer. I'm well aware of the heat transfer, so please ignore the aluminum/composite issue. My question is with the vacuum sucking the air/fuel mixture down into the manifold, would you really get any benefit from this type of adapter? It would seem like better airflow in theory but it's not increasing volume of air or fuel. Would just like your opinion on this. Just a gimic?