out of the 3, I personally like the split bumper style of the 69 best, but still prefer the 1st and 3rd gens, even so, I can enjoy a 5 to 30k car way more without worrying about every little scratch
To what end?Especially considering you would need to take it apart and start over
The only thing I actually like about the '68 taillights are the reverse lights. I can't stand double-circle taillights, it's been done to death. Were they trying to copy the rear design of the '68 'Vette? Same recessed rear window, same double-circle taillights. Did the Charger or 'Vette come out first in '68? Honest question. Wedging in the circles looks like an afterthought on the '68 Charger. The '69 and '70 taillights nailed it, IMO.it's the tail lights I think
When I look at a 69 grille, I think back to when Pontiac started their split grilles earlier.out of the 3, I personally like the split bumper style of the 69 best, but still prefer the 1st and 3rd gens, even so, I can enjoy a 5 to 30k car way more without worrying about every little scratch
I wasn't going to say anything because these cars are out of my price range, but I thought even the pictures from further back the door lines along the rocker looked wack-o.
I think your valuation is way off. Like 20K short, at least. It looks fairly decent to me, and nitpicking details like a bedliner'd trunk, stupid wire routing, trunk with apparently missing bump stops, hood springs either weak or not adjusted properly, etc. does not devalue a decent 2nd-gen Charger by 20K. Yes, it's not done but if you think a Charger like this is only worth 35K...then you and a bazillion others would be lining up in droves to buy it.As such, it should not sell for more then 35K. But it will. Most likely to a "classic car dealership".
I wouldn't.I think your valuation is way off. Like 20K short, at least. It looks fairly decent to me, and nitpicking details like a bedliner'd trunk, stupid wire routing, trunk with apparently missing bump stops, hood springs either weak or not adjusted properly, etc. does not devalue a decent 2nd-gen Charger by 20K. Yes, it's not done but if you think a Charger like this is only worth 35K...then you and a bazillion others would be lining up in droves to buy it.![]()
Yep! Right here!!some own these cars and drive them as they are, as imperfect as they may be.
Sure I drive my Roadrunner quite a lot and it has its own imperfections but thats not the point.To what end?
? Don't you drive your car?
I think this 1968 Charger R/T may end up qualifying for this thread. Listed on BaT today and zoomed immediately to $68,000+. Looks good outside and underneath but when you start looking at the undercoated hood, undercoated trunk, pitted trim, poor dash, ratty seat belts, non-stock engine compartment (supposedly original engine but who can say), non-stock wiring, etc, not my cup of tea. No telling what this will end up at in 6 more days of bidding.
1968 Dodge Charger R/T
Especially considering you would need to take it apart and start over
Sure I drive my Roadrunner quite a lot and it has its own imperfections but thats not the point.
This car is being advertised for sale as a fresh restoration to fetch a premium price, and the body does not fit together well at all.