You can tell your neighbor he's totally FOS.

His experience is limited to how P-3's did during exercises since we rarely flew on our own subs since there wasn't any point to it. During exercises, the sub would turn on augmenters, which are essentially noise makers that increase the amount of noise our subs make to make them compatible with foreign subs. They were supposed to have them running throughout the exercise, but oops... they somehow always seemed to break down and not be on, so we would be looking for the wrong sounds (I know looking for sounds seems illogical, but trust me it isn't).

But after they burned us a few times, we got wise to them and found ways around their little games. How good did we get? When I was developing training for P-3 acoustic guys in the 1990s, I was out at NAS Moffett Field collecting data for a new training program that would enable operators to more easily find our boats, and when COMSUBPAC got wind of what I was doing they confiscated every bit of data I had collected.

It's easy to say you won a fight when you get to tie the hands of your opponent.
But here's something else you can tell your neighbor. In 25+ years of working in ASW, I never saw a US SSN hold contact on a Soviet submarine, even the loudest, oldest, ones for more than 36 hours before calling up the P-3 guys to ask for help in relocating their target.

The bubbleheads love to brag about how submarines make the best anti-submarine platform, but the truth is their being in the same environment as the enemy exposes them to the same amount of risk they impart. Yeah, they're great for arriving on scene, firing, and killing the bad guy, but if their mission entails any extended tracking of a target they often break contact and lose them to avoid becoming a target themselves, and when they do... guess who they call to go find the sub they lost and tell them where it is? The P-3 guys.
