I added the CR sheet to see...
Morning when you run those numbers I was going to go with cometic gasket with a 4.380 diameter for the 4.350 bore at ,060 compressed thicknessI added the CR sheet to see...
I spelled skew wrong. Can’t post a video. Look at the top of the intake runner to the machined surface of the headI can't see what your talking about from the pictures. Can you get all 4 corners bolt holes to line up? Is the intake too high, too low? You may not be able to use metal shim gaskets for the intake. I don't know what ascew means either. Not sure if you can look into the runners with a bore scope to see how they line up to the intake port at the head.
With your gasket dimensions for the Cometic HG, entering the other piston dimensions of 4.300" ring area diameter, the top land dimension of 0.250", and a guess at the chamfer of 0.031" @60 degrees because it would seem that "Maff" is hard for some. It is too difficult to see that a chamfer is the hypotenuse of 0.031" at a specific angle (I chose 60 degrees). Anyway, I get 9.764:1 CR factoring in all of the areas contributing to the overall volume of the cylinder. Ring area volume is 1.392cc and the chamfer volume is 0.046cc for a total of 1.438cc representing a reduction in CR by 0.123:1Morning when you run those numbers I was going to go with cometic gasket with a 4.380 diameter for the 4.350 bore at ,060 compressed thickness
Thank you
One last question same cometic gasket but @ a .050 compressed value would that net me a true 10:1 ratio?With your gasket dimensions for the Cometic HG, entering the other piston dimensions of 4.300" ring area diameter, the top land dimension of 0.250", and a guess at the chamfer of 0.031" @60 degrees because it would seem that "Maff" is hard for some. It is too difficult to see that a chamfer is the hypotenuse of 0.031" at a specific angle (I chose 60 degrees). Anyway, I get 9.764:1 CR factoring in all of the areas contributing to the overall volume of the cylinder. Ring area volume is 1.392cc and the chamfer volume is 0.046cc for a total of 1.438cc representing a reduction in CR by 0.123:1
View attachment 1951521
Not fretting over it but I'm taking my time and had a certain 10:1 ratio in mind no gaskets are ordered yet, I want to cross my t's and dot my i's. I'm likely just going to shelve that manifold and get a new Edelbrock. The poor fitment of that manifold clears up a lot of issues I had with I thought were carburation issues, I think I had vacuum leaks to different degrees depending on ambient and engine temps. I really appreciate the help you provided me.A 0.050" gasket with all else the same would result in 9.997:1 CR. It is not worth fretting over for that small of a change.
But, if you want to see numbers:
0.060" Thk = 9.674
0.050" Thk = 9.997
0.045" Thl = 10.087
0.040" Thk = 10.200
The 6pk manifold could have been milled and they did not get it correct and that is why it is cock-eyed while the iron 4v fits.