- Local time
- 5:04 PM
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
- Messages
- 34,017
- Reaction score
- 41,703
- Location
- Pasadena, Texas
SS springs usually raise the back end up....,how high is your car now?
HD leaf springs vs. Standard for handling
- Thread starter Rusty knuckles
- Start date
Very slightly more than front but the front is too low and needs to come up a bit. I prefer a slight rake.Will SS leafs affect handling negativity?
- Local time
- 5:04 PM
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
- Messages
- 34,017
- Reaction score
- 41,703
- Location
- Pasadena, Texas
A vehicle that's lower has a lower center of gravity and that generally helps the way it acts in the handling department. I lowered my 66 Belvedere a pretty good amount in the front and the back was already a little bit low because the springs were flat but it did have a slight rake..... probably an inch or so lower in the front. Threw on some good shocks, added quite a bit of camber with wider wheels and decent tires and it was like night and day difference and that was without sway bars on it. I guess one way to find out if it handles better with the SS springs is to give it a shot. Can you post a picture of The stance of the car now?
I will soon. I'm in the hospital right now. I'll get back to you. Thanks for the help, Dave
My preference has always been a stiff chassis, fairly soft springs, beefy sway bars, premium shocks & a performance alignment....
I've ridden in stiffly sprung cars that at least at the performance level of a street car doesn't handle sufficiently better than my cars to justify the harshness... I know lots of guys use the biggest torsion bars & HD springs.... I'd rather keep the best ride quality I can & still handle well enough to keep up with most modern cars...
I've ridden in stiffly sprung cars that at least at the performance level of a street car doesn't handle sufficiently better than my cars to justify the harshness... I know lots of guys use the biggest torsion bars & HD springs.... I'd rather keep the best ride quality I can & still handle well enough to keep up with most modern cars...
- Local time
- 5:04 PM
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2009
- Messages
- 34,017
- Reaction score
- 41,703
- Location
- Pasadena, Texas
I used to have some high performance handling books and one of them talked about spring rates and street cars that handle good and it mentioned that very thing about not using heavy duty springs and using bigger sway bars with them. My Belvedere was a perfect example of that but was also a lightweight car at 3150 with me in it....and it had no sway bars on it. Sure it had some body roll but it was nowhere near like it was before I did the mods.
- Local time
- 4:04 PM
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2021
- Messages
- 2,743
- Reaction score
- 5,442
- Location
- Roswell, New Mexico
Calculating suspension frequencies
to obtain a "flat ride" on a vehicle
driven mainly on the street requires
the separation of sprung vs unsprung
weights, the weight of the vehicle at
each tire, weights of the front and rear
seperately,, the spring rate for both the
front and rear springs, Sprung weight
includes a full tank of gas, and 300 lbs
for vehicle occupants.
Cross corner weights aren't necessary
unless you're going to be tracking the
vehicle.
What to shoot for is a frequency of
1 htz for the front, and 1.3 htz for the
rear.
(htz=the least amount of oscillations at both axles after going over a bump.)
This is how vehicle manufacturers
calculate springs for their vehicles.
But this can be speculative as some
prefer a firmer feel in their rides, as I
did on a 2006 Jeep Rubicon..Off the
showroom floor, felt like riding on a
watered. (suspension calculated for
the 95 percentile masses). Added a
3 inch lift, 33 inch tall tires (added
unsprung weight). All 4 corners
weighed again, and a new set of
springs with the correct rate
installed to maintain the strived
for frequencies.
to obtain a "flat ride" on a vehicle
driven mainly on the street requires
the separation of sprung vs unsprung
weights, the weight of the vehicle at
each tire, weights of the front and rear
seperately,, the spring rate for both the
front and rear springs, Sprung weight
includes a full tank of gas, and 300 lbs
for vehicle occupants.
Cross corner weights aren't necessary
unless you're going to be tracking the
vehicle.
What to shoot for is a frequency of
1 htz for the front, and 1.3 htz for the
rear.
(htz=the least amount of oscillations at both axles after going over a bump.)
This is how vehicle manufacturers
calculate springs for their vehicles.
But this can be speculative as some
prefer a firmer feel in their rides, as I
did on a 2006 Jeep Rubicon..Off the
showroom floor, felt like riding on a
watered. (suspension calculated for
the 95 percentile masses). Added a
3 inch lift, 33 inch tall tires (added
unsprung weight). All 4 corners
weighed again, and a new set of
springs with the correct rate
installed to maintain the strived
for frequencies.
Similar threads
