I'm somehow on a list where I get sent articles tracking I'm sure topics I read. One is Hot Cars. Wow, these writers are ultra-opinionated, reminds me of other news sources for tainted news. These guys get paid well writing about their slants? Its been evident their level of knowledge is shallow, more to do with sifting the web I assume on various cars likely never turning a wrench on one. One article I read this morning (sorry lost the link) says "Dodges pre-65 were ugly" while mentioning their kick *** motors in passing. So this schmuck writer thinks...say a '64 Polara is ugly? Just like that? In the height of the drag racing era, early B's were king. Venting (I don't own one; but always liked 'em and have a '63 Fury). My cousin bought a '64 Polara new 426/4sp and was turning in the 12's with it back then. Many of their articles are highly opinionated and suppose that's all ok; except when they have their opinions based on what? Reminds me of an old family friend who thought he was God's gift of auto knowledge...except he could barely change the oil...