I think it's a cliff hanger to get us to watch the video where he tests the "accurate" sending unit.
Could be. I always try to put part numbers in my videos and sometimes where I bought it.
I put a Tanks Inc (Spectra) tank and sender in my 66 Dart and it was fairly accurate. The way the new senders are designed compared to the old ones, they usually get to full before the tank is and it takes some driving before the gauge starts going down. (Not a problem with me) As long as the float is close to the bottom when the gas is about gone, all is good. If your gauge reads empty or a bit less and you can drive 30 mines before running out, all the better. If I was that **** about fuel gauge accuracy, I would have the original sender rebuilt or look for a NOS one. That's not me though.
Thanks for the comparison. Assuming that is a 60s Mopar part, seems like a very easy part to replicate.
I just ordered one. I almost ran out of gas. I tried adding another resistor in parallel but it kept the gauge at full. I just want the darn thing to work. Thanks for posting.
According to some poeple, you're being too **** wanting your fuel gauge to read accurately.
Wow, you just summed me up in 40 words or less! Lol. Yes, I want the darn thing to work as it should.
I agree it is only a suggestion. I just add 180 (12 mpg x 15 gal conservative estimate) + current odometer at fill up. I usually round up/down so the mileage number is easy to remember and put it in my phone or write it down somewhere if it is going to be a while between fill ups.
Ditto!
Who did you have do it for that price?
X2
