• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

MC brake choice

jimbosride

FBBO Gold Member
FBBO Gold Member
Local time
1:26 AM
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
807
Reaction score
2,009
Location
Washington state
New fuel system is done now it's time to think about the brakes on the RR build. I going to go with non-power disc/ drum on the car and found this MC.

If I go with this I would not have to put an adjustable valve on the rears? and use a stock distribution block? Anyone go this route?

Thanks :p
1754416778197.png


20250709_201709.jpg
 
That is a big bore for manual disc brakes. You will need a strong leg. The master cyl.has nothing to do with brake proportioning.
 
That unit is too big for a manual system. It would be fine for power brakes though.
Going over 1.03 for a manual brake setup means a lot more pedal effort than most people would like.
 
Ok .... did not know or think about bore size. I went with a stock unit and disc brakes on my 65 and it works ok but the adjustable valve is leaking.
I did not want to go the power brake route but now I'm not sure.

The car is going back to mostly stock with some upgrades. No big horsepower or racing. I have had this car since 1982.

What would you guys do on this car for brakes ?

:thankyou:
 
Keep the drum brakes!!
01 CRC.jpg


cnfsd 5.gif


Well, if the car is not driven in heavy traffic or down hills, if he is always alone and never needs to stop fast two or three times in a two mile range.
Drums are fine for light duty driving but why limit yourself?
A basic 11" front disc setup like what came stock on 1973-76 A body cars, coupled with 10" rear drums and either a 15/16" manual master cylinder or a 1 1/16" master cylinder and stock vacuum booster work quite well.
 
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top