d9103365
Well-Known Member
Here's something that's going to tick everyone off. I just picked up the latest "Mopar Collector's Guide" magazine from my local BNB (vol 24 issue 2) because it had what I thought was a cool article on a 75 Road Runner. I was shocked by what I read. The article, written by a Randy Holden, was full of anti-Late B body rhetoric. Here are some quotes:
"When the last of the 2 door B bodies rolled off the line in 1974..."
"about the only thing the 75 road runner had in common with earlier versions was the unique lavender beep beep horn"
We all know this isn't true. the 75 shared an entire platform with the previous years, and much of the interior was similiar. And the 2 door B bodies sure as hec didn't end in 74.
The article continues with its "why the hec would anyone restore one of these" attitude. I believe the writer may be a pontiac fan in disguise, as he mentions them edging out mother mopar twice in the article.
What do you say guys? Should we write in and complain? I believe they should be forced to do a 'doba article as compensation!
"When the last of the 2 door B bodies rolled off the line in 1974..."
"about the only thing the 75 road runner had in common with earlier versions was the unique lavender beep beep horn"
We all know this isn't true. the 75 shared an entire platform with the previous years, and much of the interior was similiar. And the 2 door B bodies sure as hec didn't end in 74.
The article continues with its "why the hec would anyone restore one of these" attitude. I believe the writer may be a pontiac fan in disguise, as he mentions them edging out mother mopar twice in the article.
What do you say guys? Should we write in and complain? I believe they should be forced to do a 'doba article as compensation!