Dibbons
Well-Known Member
- Local time
- 7:44 AM
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2014
- Messages
- 4,753
- Reaction score
- 5,473
- Location
- La Paz, B.C.S., Mexico
Was it or wasn't it faster?
The latter, I'd say - these cars were not designed for aero efficiency obviously, whereas the "modern" vehicles'Perfect time for me to ask a question to the “Aero” experts that can answer this.
I open my windows on my 17 F150 or my 07 Charger and get blown all over on the inside of the vehicle, but when I cruise around in my 70 GTX with all the windows open I could light a match in there because it’s so calm, we’re the 68 to 70 B bodies that good aerodynamically, or were they so bad that they were just plowing such a big hole in the air?
Freakin' BOSS if you ask me - you don't see such stuff in racers these days.Jumps out during a pit stop to fix his car, hilarious!
Try it in a Superbird or Daytona. At 120 MPH with the windows down there is absolutely no buffering air in the car it’s eerily void of wind or wind noise inside.Perfect time for me to ask a question to the “Aero” experts that can answer this.
I open my windows on my 17 F150 or my 07 Charger and get blown all over on the inside of the vehicle, but when I cruise around in my 70 GTX with all the windows open I could light a match in there because it’s so calm, we’re the 68 to 70 B bodies that good aerodynamically, or were they so bad that they were just plowing such a big hole in the air?