I'll be glad to take the points you made one by one.
More room: For what? If everything clears and I can work on it without skinning knuckles, I see no benefit.
Less flex: Compared to stock? Maybe, maybe not. The stock K member can be reinforced with perimiter welding and the addition of a few gussets. The RMS system places all the suspension loads into the frame rails. The stock setup DIVIDES the suspension forces between the frame rails, the floorpan and the torsion bar crossmember.
Lighter front end: You win here. The stock stuff is heavier. It is that way because the car was designed for 100,000 mile durability. Early failures are bad for an automaker. The bad rep from the Aspen/Volare sent many potential Mopar buyers to GM and Ford.
Massive tunability: This is probably true. If you are racing and need more spring rate or softer shocks, I can see that these setups might be great. If you own a street car that doesn't get raced at different road courses every weekend, the tunability isn't much benefit.
Now I'll take it further.....
* As mentioned by Mopar Action magazine Editor Rick Ehrenberg: The outer tie rod attachment is a substandard method. The steering rack attaches the spindle with a deep spacer to minimize bump steer. Anyone with any sense knows that the best way to attach two members is directly with NO spacer. Wheels, pulleys, you name it. Spacers are a band-aid. Build it to fit with a proper spindle and the risk of failure diminishes dramatically.
Good luck to those that own and enjoy these kits. I just do not see the benefits.