- Local time
- 8:41 AM
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2010
- Messages
- 17,427
- Reaction score
- 21,642
- Location
- Muroc Dry Lake Bed
Yes, eliminate the TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership)
Amen to that note...Yes, eliminate the TPP (Trans Pacific Partnership)
Have you seen these "islands" they are building? Let's look at one...
![]()
First, it's not an actual island. It is a sandbar, and as us Navy guys learn, sandbars come and go. They aren't made out of a base rock like a real island is, so wind, rain, wave action, and heavy weather can destroy them rather quickly. Plus they're built in the Pacific volcanic region and one minor tidal wave that would do nothing to a real island would return that whole area back to ocean in seconds. So the reality is their little bases could be there ten years from now, or wiped out tomorrow.
Second, since the base has no real underlying structure, all its logistics is either above the surface or under sand, which makes it very susceptible to attack. A base with aircraft but no fuel, ordnance, potable water, or even food isn't much good. A couple of cruise missiles would make this base unusable in short order.
Third, given the instability of the foundation, how long do you think that runway is gonna stay useable? You're a wing wiper right? What's the life expectancy of a concrete runway on terra firma? I know we have to overhaul ours every five or six years and they aren't built on sand.
These bases don'y worry me in the least. The only thing the Chinese have that I worry about is their growing submarine force. Now that is a threat.
As for pursuing new systems, I agree we need newer and better ones. The problem with that is we used to design and build our own newer and better systems, but that's no longer the case. Everyone is getting pushed more and more into finding COTS solutions instead of GOTS, so we're taking more and more system hardware, software, cabling, and other components that were designed to function in offices or factories and sticking them into combat vehicles that are going to be subjected to shocks, damage, and environmental conditions that they were never designed to withstand. That's a recipie for disaster.
you were 100% spot on about China's threat in that regionReport from Global Securities:
-There are a few basic facts about China's claims in the South China Sea that are centrl to understanding the dispute. China has declared the South China Sea to be a "core interest" worth fighting for, along with Taiwan and Tibet, but it only discovered this fact in 2010. China claims the entire South China Sea, but only discovered this ownership in 1949. China's claim to the entire South China Sea is unique in maritime law, and contravenes the fundamental principle of the Law of the Sea that requires maritime claims to be based on land features, not arbitrary lines on the water on a map. There is no basis for a "split the difference" compromise. China is building new islands in the South China Sea by dredging up reef material. China appears to claim territorial waters for these artificial islands, violating a fundamental principle of maritime law that such artificial creations cannot acquire territorial waters.
The United States called in late 2015 for a halt to China's artificial island-building, and in recent weeks has tried to signal its determination to challenge Beijing over the disputed sea by sending military ships and planes near the islands.
you were 100% spot on about China's threat in that region
prior to 2015 & well into 2016
& for the USA, NATO or the world for that matter...
weak & feckless admin. at the time
let this happen, they are at it again too
didn't help they stripped much of our military
down to pre-WWII levels, lowest levels in some 70 years
we will pay dearly for it now,
especially now in TODAY's political climate