- Local time
- 12:57 PM
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2020
- Messages
- 3,277
- Reaction score
- 11,484
- Location
- State College, Pennsylvania
In the great deep blue state of CT cops cannot pull anyone over move "defective equipment" such as a tail light. the legislature decided it was racial profiling.
What was a bit amusing in retrospect, was that I dealt with this stuff as an attorney for four decades, including a decade as a general counsel dealing with 900 trucks. I always advised my drivers not to argue the law on the side of the road. My former trooper friend was starting to escalate with the officer, vehemently asserting that he was a first hand witness to me activating the turn signal, and pointing out that the dash and fender indicators were flashing. When it became obvious I was still going to get the moving violation, I asked him to back off. I politely told the officer this wasn't my first rodeo, and I would take him at his word, and see him in court.That's the problem with a lot of these small boroughs in PA. They usually have a few full time guys and then several part timer's. The overall quality of the individuals applying for these positions IMO is substandard, and has been for many years. But a lot of departments, including PSP have been lowering the standards to encourage substandard people to apply. Oh, too many people are out of shape and can't make the sit-up requirement, no problem we will just remove the sit-up requirement.
You can't write an equipment issue as a moving violation. The PA Vehicle Code defines the difference with the applicable sections. Traffic stop conversations like the one above are from cops that are issuing tickets for stats to justify how they spent their time on shift and keep a supervisor off their back instead of actually doing police work.
He might have thought I was blowing smoke, but I hope he realized afterwards, he should have selected a more suitable victim. Most folks don't know the fine print of the Pennsylvania statutes. I do.