8 3/4 Rearend for Wide Tires

I have heard that the narrowest 8 3/4 Chrysler built came off the 1965 Dodge/Plymouths? I want to find the narrowest year to put the widest tires I can under the back of my 64 without having to narrow it up or tub the car. When I was in high school my dad built a 1964 Dodge 330 and fit 12" wide Mickey Thompsons inside the rear wheel wells without any modifications other than a rear end swap and they fit perfect. That car looked great without sacrificing the body or style in any way. Any ideas here?

I placed a 66 Dodge 8 3/4 under a duster for this same reason. This rear end is the most narrow and allowed me to fit some HUGE tires without modification. Was it close to the lip---sure, but it fit nevertheless. I don't have the measurements on this particular rear axle in front of me, but I'm sure others will chime in.

I "think" these are correct numbers. There are many sources and as I have read, many show some wrong info. If these are wrong someone can say, then I can correct my data as well.
I also believe the reason for putting them in an A-body is to move the tires out further from the springs. Then you can run a deeper offset rim allowing more rubber.

Mopar 8 3/4" Rear End Dimensions
........................................
........................................
8 3/4" axle shaft lengths measured from the tip of the splined end
to the outside of the flange:
A BODY
'66-'72= 27 11/16"
B BODY
'65-'67= 28 7/8"
'68-'70= 29 3/16"
'71-'74= 30 5/8"
'71-'73 wagon= 31 21/64"
C BODY
'65-'69= 30"
'70-'71= 30 5/8" (Chrysler & Fury)
'70-'73= 31 21/64" (and '69 wagon)

IMPERIAL (Large Bolt Pattern)
'65-'66= 30 1/8"
'67-'69= 30 5/16"
'70-'71= 29"
'72-'73= 31 7/16"
E BODY
'70-'74= 29 31/32"
A100
'65-'70= 30"
D100
'65-'71= 31 1/8"
'72-'74= 31 21/64
...........................................
...........................................
Housing widths, flange to flange
A BODY
'66-'72= 52 5/8"
B BODY
'62-'63= 53 1/4" (And '64 Max Wedge)
'64 = 55 5/8" (Exc. Max Wedge)
'65-'67= 54 1/4"
'68-'70= 54 15/16"
'71-'74= 57 7/8"
'71-'73 wagon= 59 7/16"
C BODY
'65-'69= 56 3/4"
'70-'71= 57 7/8" (Chrysler & Fury)
'70-'74= 59 7/16" (and '69 wagon)
IMPERIAL
'65-'66= 57"
'67-'69= 57 3/8"
'70-'71= 54 3/4"
'72-'73= 59 5/8"
E BODY
'70-'74= 56 31/64"
A100
'65-'70= 56 3/4"
D100
'65-'71= 58 5/16"
'72-'74= 59 7/16"
.........................................
.........................................
Rear end widths, drum-to-drum:
A BODY
'66-'72= 57 1/8"
B BODY
'62-'63= 58 1/2" (And '64 Max Wedge)
'64 = 60 7/8" (Exc.Max Wedge)
'65-'67= 59 1/2"
'68-'70= 60 1/8"
'71-'74= 63"
'71-'73 wagon= 64 3/8"
C BODY
'65-'69= 61.75"
'70-'71= 63.0" (Chrysler & Fury)
'70-'73= 64 3/8" (and '69 wagon)
IMPERIAL
'65-'66= 61 15/16"
'67-'69= 62 5/16"
'70-'71= 59 3/4"
'72-'73= 64 9/16"
E BODY
'70-'74= 61 5/8"
A100
'65-'70= 61 3/4"
D100
'65-'71= 63 15/16"
'72-'74= 64 3/8"
........................................
........................................
Spring perch widths (center-to-center)
A BODY
'66-73= 43"
B BODY
'62-'70= 44"
'71-'74= 47.3"
C BODY
'65-'73= 46"
E BODY
'70-'74= 46"

the narrowest rear housing is a 68-70 A body 8.3/4 with big bolt pattern! getting hard to find but can be found around $200.00! I'd get a C body and have it narrowed! 65 B-body is the next one that will work, you'll still be limited on how wide you want to put under the car.

Was there BBP in A-body prior to '73? After '72, you could only get 8 1/4 in A-bodies. And as far as I knew there never was a BBP A-body 8 3/4.

There was never an A body 8 3/4 with the larger bolt pattern. A-bodies started coming with the larger pattern after 1973 and that is when the 8 3/4 was stopped in them. Conversion axles can be found easily enough.
The narrowest 8 3/4 axle with the larger bolt pattern would be in the early B bodies (1960's).
I had heard that the 62-65 B axles were an inch narrower than the 66-70 B axles but have not been able to confirm.
I have an 8 3/4 in my 65 Belvedere and could measure it.

If the OP does not want to tub the car why not just use a different offset wheel to get the maximum size tire the stock wheel tub will allow? A shorter rear end will not make any more room for a bigger tire....

no myth
my 65-67 8 3/4 measures exact to whats stated above
works in 62-65 b bodies is proven to work great 30x12.50 x15 or 29x 12.50 x 15 or 29x10.50x15 with superstocks or luniac launchers , cal tracs 1 inch up

Longroof said:

If the OP does not want to tub the car why not just use a different offset wheel to get the maximum size tire the stock wheel tub will allow? A shorter rear end will not make any more room for a bigger tire....

Click to expand...

X2. On my 1969 cars, the tires will hit the inner wheelhouses before the springs when everything is stock.

Longroof said:

If the OP does not want to tub the car why not just use a different offset wheel to get the maximum size tire the stock wheel tub will allow? A shorter rear end will not make any more room for a bigger tire....

Click to expand...

I was wondering how long it would take for someone to finally give the OP the correct answer to his question. The solution is NOT a narrower rear end housing, its the proper offset wheels to accomodate the desired tire width.

Longroof said:

If the OP does not want to tub the car why not just use a different offset wheel to get the maximum size tire the stock wheel tub will allow? A shorter rear end will not make any more room for a bigger tire....

Click to expand...

X3. Need to move the springs in to get wider than 10"

You can install a rear from a 65-70 B body into the 62-64 B bodies. Just a bolt in. The narrowest being the 65-67 B body rear. Spring perches are already in the right place, a simple bolt-in.