• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

75-79 dodge/chrysler/plymouth history

Very cool stuff. I am getting a fever to work on my doba again. Hurry up winter!
 
Now thats pretty damn cool!!!!!!!!!!!.....wished they had advertizing like that for the 76 Coronets....really hadn't seen a whole lot....
 
So, are the trunklids different from Doba to Charger too? I thought it was just the lights and quarter extensions. The wrap-around lenses make the side markers unnecessary, but I thought besides that they were the same. Actually, I'm probably more likely to just fill those side marker holes and find some different lights and mount em in the sheetmetal. The old B body round ones would look cool, but they'd have to be overpriced repops.
If you know of anyone wanting to sell a set of the bumper-to-body filler pieces, I'm definitely interested in em. Especially, the rear...my fronts are salvagable.
 
the 75-77 doba and charger deck lids are the same. the 78-79 doba and magnum are the same. if you wanted to use the magnum rear treatment stuff on a 75-77 you can, but you would have to change evey bolt on piece on the rear including the decklid. the style lines on the quarter panels are identical for all 75-79s.you can even use the magnum doors on any 75-79 charger or cordoba, which eventually ,i am going to put on my charger because they really look cool. the only things that changed are all the bolt on pieces. i have access to a ton of 75-77 doba parts and 2 78 dobas and 2 magnums. most have been pieced out but there are still good parts on them. i found a bunch of magnum stock car pics and some adds , you may have seen them,but i will put them up anyway
 

Attachments

  • ggg.jpg
    ggg.jpg
    58.7 KB · Views: 418
  • ggg1.jpg
    ggg1.jpg
    27.3 KB · Views: 416
  • ggg2.jpg
    ggg2.jpg
    87.9 KB · Views: 418
  • ggg3.jpg
    ggg3.jpg
    102.5 KB · Views: 425
  • ggg4.jpg
    ggg4.jpg
    67.1 KB · Views: 424
...
 

Attachments

  • ggg9.jpg
    ggg9.jpg
    104.4 KB · Views: 416
  • ggg8.jpg
    ggg8.jpg
    90.9 KB · Views: 424
  • ggg7.jpg
    ggg7.jpg
    86.1 KB · Views: 543
  • ggg6.jpg
    ggg6.jpg
    61.8 KB · Views: 411
  • ggg5.jpg
    ggg5.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 427
....
 

Attachments

  • ggg14.jpg
    ggg14.jpg
    113.8 KB · Views: 418
  • ggg12.jpg
    ggg12.jpg
    97.5 KB · Views: 881
  • ggg11.jpg
    ggg11.jpg
    95.7 KB · Views: 424
  • ggg10.jpg
    ggg10.jpg
    54.1 KB · Views: 427
...
 

Attachments

  • ggg18.jpg
    ggg18.jpg
    165.3 KB · Views: 405
  • ggg17.jpg
    ggg17.jpg
    19.5 KB · Views: 376
  • ggg16.jpg
    ggg16.jpg
    119.9 KB · Views: 376
  • ggg15.jpg
    ggg15.jpg
    153 KB · Views: 356
and a couple more
 

Attachments

  • ggg19.jpg
    ggg19.jpg
    85.8 KB · Views: 394
  • ggg20.jpg
    ggg20.jpg
    68.1 KB · Views: 422
some random pics
 

Attachments

  • et11.jpg
    et11.jpg
    47 KB · Views: 392
  • et10.jpg
    et10.jpg
    37.7 KB · Views: 383
  • et9.jpg
    et9.jpg
    107.4 KB · Views: 366
  • et8.jpg
    et8.jpg
    113.6 KB · Views: 480
  • ggg22.gif
    ggg22.gif
    37.5 KB · Views: 364
a few more
 

Attachments

  • et12.jpg
    et12.jpg
    114.9 KB · Views: 374
  • et14.jpg
    et14.jpg
    55.2 KB · Views: 380
  • et15.jpg
    et15.jpg
    97 KB · Views: 371
  • et16.jpg
    et16.jpg
    105.9 KB · Views: 443
a few more random pics. the seldom seen 76 base charger, of which was actually plymouth bodied. and the 78??? charger SE? i dont think so.i emailed the company that has this "factory photo" and asked them if they added the text to the photo stating that 77 was the last year for the B bodied charger and the SE.no response as of yet.
 

Attachments

  • et25.jpg
    et25.jpg
    31.9 KB · Views: 389
  • et26.jpg
    et26.jpg
    56.8 KB · Views: 384
  • et27.jpg
    et27.jpg
    49 KB · Views: 383
  • et28.jpg
    et28.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 370
  • et29.jpg
    et29.jpg
    40.6 KB · Views: 383
a few more of interest..
 

Attachments

  • et52.jpg
    et52.jpg
    66.2 KB · Views: 382
  • et51.jpg
    et51.jpg
    55.8 KB · Views: 357
  • et50.jpg
    et50.jpg
    33.1 KB · Views: 365
Here's a 78 Charger for sale in OH... http://akroncanton.craigslist.org/cto/2721591010.html.
I thought 77 was the last year for B body Chargers, Magnum took over from there. In case the ad gets deleted, the 78 is white, has a white interior, black steelies with poverty caps, and is delightfully devoid of the tons of "classy" trim and lights and baroque **** n geegaws that adorn the upscale Chrysler variant. It's what my Cordoba wants to be when it grows up.
 
Here's a 78 Charger for sale in OH... http://akroncanton.craigslist.org/cto/2721591010.html.
I thought 77 was the last year for B body Chargers, Magnum took over from there. In case the ad gets deleted, the 78 is white, has a white interior, black steelies with poverty caps, and is delightfully devoid of the tons of "classy" trim and lights and baroque **** n geegaws that adorn the upscale Chrysler variant. It's what my Cordoba wants to be when it grows up.
A quite common thought. They only made a couple thousand as the Magnum replaced it that year. Edit: Hmm, interesting ad... the LAST year Charger B-body...
 
Last edited:
this raises a lot of questions for me, does that make it a 78 and a 1/2 charger SE ? so was the magnum and the charger SE both offered at the beginning of 78? did they drop the SE midyear? that is the first i have ever heard of a 78.those production numbers have got to be extremely low.the grill appears to be a 77 carry over but there are no shots of the tail lights. i am going to email them and see if i can get a pic of the rear.in all the production number stats i have seen, not a one refers to 78 charger SE production. that is weird that they would change the cordoba styling in 78 and not the charger SE. the 78 SE must have only ran a couple of months because it still had round headlights and the doba had square double stacked headlights in the beginning of 78. im so confused lol
 
Everything I've ever read said that the Cordoba-based Charger was a 2 year only deal because of dismal sales. Whereas the Cordobas were selling 150,000+ per year, the Chargers were only selling at a rate of 25 to 30 thousand per year. The Charger nameplate was dropped after the 75-77 run and the Magnum took its place. A Chrysler executive stated that not carrying over the 74 Charger body style was a HUGE miscalculation.
I have no idea where a round-lighted 78 Charger came from...maybe a late production 77 that sat on the dealer's lot and first got titled in 78? Just one of those "had ta be there" mysteries, I guess. For $1800 I'd sure like to have it.
 
heres a few "78s" i found looking around. the 78 carried the 77 rear treatment as well. there was no change from a 77 se to 78 se from what i can tell..
 

Attachments

  • wd4.jpg
    wd4.jpg
    26.6 KB · Views: 376
  • wd3.jpg
    wd3.jpg
    19.7 KB · Views: 350
  • wd2.gif
    wd2.gif
    15.8 KB · Views: 360
  • wd1.jpg
    wd1.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 356
  • wd.jpg
    wd.jpg
    67.7 KB · Views: 356
as i stated earlier, production numbers had to be low.judging by the chart, it would appear that MAYBE 4000 slipped out but im guessing it was less than that. goes to show that sometimes you just never know....
 
3500 bucks for this one! are they gaining value or is this guy just trying to make a buck.. they say its a 78.
 

Attachments

  • wd7.jpg
    wd7.jpg
    132.2 KB · Views: 338
  • wd6.jpg
    wd6.jpg
    101.1 KB · Views: 354
heres another one didnt catch the price.this is how 85% of them ended up im sure.
 

Attachments

  • wd5.jpg
    wd5.jpg
    46.8 KB · Views: 335
Auto Transport Service
Back
Top