RemCharger
Well-Known Member
I'm fairly certain a buddy of mine had 2 74 Chargers, built about 200 apart, on the same day.It was around 48 hours in 1973, likely not much change for other years.
I'm fairly certain a buddy of mine had 2 74 Chargers, built about 200 apart, on the same day.It was around 48 hours in 1973, likely not much change for other years.
Last 6 are a sequential number only. Of the 1st 7 the engine (5th character) and assembly location (7th character) could be different with the same last 6 from two different factories I believe. For example, you can have a Hamtramck charger with XS29L8B123456 and a St Louis charger with XS29L8G123456. Yes?The last 6 cannot be the same with the same engine. That would mean the cars would have the same serial number/vin.
My door sticker says 9-69, and that’s all. My SPD is A01, October 1st.But look at your door sticker and it’ll tell day time and shift it was either started or ended assembly
I’m pretty sure if you look at the fine print in the lower corners there should be infoMy door sticker says 9-69, and that’s all. My SPD is A01, October 1st.
Nope, nothing about any of that, just the vin and the assembly month and year.I’m pretty sure if you look at the fine print in the lower corners there should be info
It’s an article posted here in the wing car section. It’s entitled “how the Superbird was made” or something like that.Interesting. what website is that from?
I’m almost sure the sequence number is just that, a sequential number, meaning that they are consecutive. It starts out as 100001 at most plants and goes up from there. What changes randomly is the car it’s assigned to, meaning 100002 is given to the next order logged, whether it be a Superbee or grandmas station wagon, or any of the different models that specific plant produces. Hence, there would be no 2 VINs alike, as only one of each sequential number is produced per plant.I would expect that the sequence number could be used on other cars when the first 2 or 4 characters were different. I don’t see why a Valiant couldn’t have the same sequence number as a Satellite. Think of how many cars they made in a year. It seems 6 digits might not have been enough to cover all the cars so the sequence was unique enough when preceded by different XS29 or XH29 characters.
Huh I’ll have to look at mine but swear I had info but on another car (90 Daytona ) it had that info so maybe that’s where I’m thinking of thatNope, nothing about any of that, just the vin and the assembly month and year.
View attachment 1558336
If I recall, Plymouth built over 300,000 Dusters in 1973 alone. Imagine adding up the Valiants, Satellites, Furys, every other car. You could have exceeded 1 million cars in a model year, right?Kern,
My math is a little rusty so I had to look this one up:
how many 6 digit combinations of the numbers o-9 can be made
---------
0 to 9 is 10 numbers
--> 10^6 = 1,000,000 if you include 000000, 000001, etc
Damn
But those were not all produced at the same plant, multiple plants means multiple sequential repeats, but at different plants. Since the VIN reflects the plant in the characters, even tho every plant uses the same sequential system, the plant letter in the VIN settles that overlap.If I recall, Plymouth built over 300,000 Dusters in 1973 alone. Imagine adding up the Valiants, Satellites, Furys, every other car. You could have exceeded 1 million cars in a model year, right?