The worst Muscle Car article I've ever seen.

[SteveSS]

It had to be written by an 8-year-old lesbian. The pictures, facts, and numbers are wrong. Sorry, it's all clickbait.

https://www.brakeforit.com/classic/...814229574-ya&utm_term=foxnews.com-ya&chrome=1

 

[Michael_]

1970s Era Oldsmobile Cutlass

Unfortunately what was once a promising muscle car quickly became just a Chevrolet Malibu with a name change and new badging. The engine of the car was also identical to the Chevrolet Malibu and long gone was the V8 that the Oldsmobile originally sported.

I own a 72 cutlass supreme.
Nothing like the good old "olds rocket" by chevrolet.

 

[Lefty71]

Dying to know the breadth of your knowledge on the subject of 8 year old lesbians! jk

 

[Richard Cranium]

It had to be written by an 8-year-old lesbian.

You give the writer too much credit.

 

[dadsbee]

Well if it's all click bait, WTH would you share it..

 

[BeatersRus]

hmm,funny,i went thru the whole thing.
basically,its an article describing how bad the " newer " versions of our older musclecars Became.
oddly,about 3/4 of the way thru,they switch to all sorts of cars and continue to bash them.
the basic context of the article is indeed correct tho,even if not 100% accurate.
those were the worst versions of our beloved musclecars/and the names being shared.

 

[rumblefish360]

It had to be written by an 8-year-old lesbian. The pictures, facts, and numbers are wrong. Sorry, it's all clickbait.

I agree, Also, a know nothing *** wipe, a dirty used on at that. The following quote is the worst I have ever seen put into print!

“Initially, the Plymouth was a road hog and was really impressive on the track. It looked good and under the hood, it was sporting the 426 Hemi engine and had 160 horsepower.”

 

[Fran Blacker]

A boat T bird as a muscle car? A 70's GTO with a picture of a 67 GTO for crying out loud.

 

[rumblefish360]

Not that this would do any good.....So I wrote them this below;

Some Of The Worst Muscle Cars That Have Ever Been Released

This is the worst article I have ever read with not one, but the entire article is chock full of just simply out right wrong information from start until I could no longer turn a page. Since when did the Dodge 426 HEMI ever come with less than 426hp? And then to list it making 300 less? Why would you ever let this article ever go out without a fact check, much less even consider that the person writing the article has no care or concern of what there writing. You should! That person turned your place into an overnight uncreditable joke.

 

[R413]

Dying to know the breadth of your knowledge on the subject of 8 year old lesbians! jk

This will get you started, LOL

https://www.christianheadlines.com/...0TERYkuLQnakIVNPgIcibAgiL4hyGpG1eM0DAFoZ8fA9I

 

[eldubb440]

******* millennials...... this hobby is dead in 15 years, sell high while you still can

 

[70chall440]

I went through the entire thing and 2 things came to mind, first is that the write is most likely a Ferrari or lambo fanboy but second they do show some pretty crappy "muscle cars" which isn't really fair considering federal regulations, insurance rates, etc. I know some have soft spots for some of those cars but in the context of the cars of the mid/late 60's and early 70's many of them were disappointments.

 

[Bb70charger500]

Some dumb *** collecting a check

 

[Bb70charger500]

Fact check!?!?!?! Haaa thats a thing of the past

 

[yella71]

Its true ....426 hemi had 160 hp.....@ 2350 rpm

 

[69a100]

Sorry, it's all clickbait.

So am I supposed to read it or blow it off?

 

[rmchrgr]

Sometimes you run across things that make no sense on the internet, probably best to just ignore them.

 

[Budnicks]

not worth it