- Local time
- 9:04 PM
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2014
- Messages
- 28,680
- Reaction score
- 67,556
- Location
- Salisbury, Vermont
"Planet of the Humans" documentary.
Michael MOORE! That fat **** needs to burn in hell. Libtard POS.
"Planet of the Humans" documentary.
wow,you Really nailed it.
excellent point about the environment versus climate change.
i guess thats my way of thinking,that humanity is really working against itself on this planet.
we are like a scourge upon the earth.
we pollute in So many ways,
raze entire areas of trees and vegetation,
work our croplands till they are no longer fertile,
treat our farmers the worst and depend on them the most,
pour chemicals and feces into the oceans,
dump our trash and nuclear fuel into them....
the list is endless....
there was a part in the movie the Matrix that explains Perfectly what im trying to say...
go to 2:13-3:07 on this vid,and lmk what you think....
heres the quote as well,in case youd rather just read it.
Agent Smith: I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species and I realized that you're not actually mammals. Every mammal on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding environment but you humans do not. You move to an area and you multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another area. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Human beings are a disease, a cancer of this planet.
I started recycling yrs ago and now it's nothing but milk jugs,water; no plastic bags of any kind. I smell conspiracy. No real idea for reformulating any of this stuff,and by the way; how big is that plastic puddle out in the central Pacific Ocean?At this point the only way to reverse the pollution of our environment is to absolutely ban any and all plastic items. Period. No more convenience crap. Glass or coated cardboard. No more plastic bags. Or paper bags. Use a cloth sack. No more just throwing **** out for a newer model. Anything that you don't want gets taken to a center by you or the trash man for recycling or rehoming. Toxic waste has to be dealt with, regardless of cost. If it cant be made harmless then don't produce it. Stop paving over every damn thing.
Of course all of that will never come to pass in a zillion years because..human nature. Because no money to be made from those practices.
Never been to either location. I heard that LoneStar beer is pretty good tho,lol.The GPGP covers an estimated surface area of 1.6 million square kilometers, an area twice the size of Texas or three times the size of France.
No real idea for reformulating any of this stuff
It's ok....there's better as far as domestics go.Never been to either location. I heard that LoneStar beer is pretty good tho,lol.
That wasn't the question.heres some proof that mankind can,has,and will continue to mess up the planet.
remember,pollution isnt just some smoke in a chimney......
How long will Fukushima be radioactive?
Seven years on, radioactive water at Fukushima plant still flowing into ocean, study finds. More than seven years after the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear crisis, radioactive water is continuing to flow into the Pacific Ocean from the crippled No. 1 plant at a rate of around 2 billion becquerels a day, a study has found.Mar 29, 2018.
Seven years on, no end in sight for Fukushima's long recovery. Removing nuclear fuel from the Fukushima Daiichi power plant will take 30 to 40 years, Tepco says.Mar 11, 2018
Maybe that's the Canadian way of solving things.Plastics can be turned into fuel. This was discovered quite some time ago but since there is no profit to be made, no appetite for its wide use. Make the plastic manufacturers pay into the cost of this kind of recycling. Government needs to act.
Models are not observed science. They are predictions made by......I'll jump in. A few years back I did a quick calculation with publicly available data and a prediction that was made and published 30 years ago that was based on the radiative forcing of carbon dioxide (taking into account human emissions). I had no idea how this would work out. The result suggests the models are better than we give them credit for and that the forcing of those models with carbon dioxide produced by people would match the conditions that resulted after those models were made. This is what climate science can tell us. The climate predictions are of use for people in insurance industries, military, and other businesses. I am well aware that we cannot prove things physical or climate related, however, we have a lot of evidence that points to a human impact. Pollution, environmental change, frequent flooding, tornadoes, climate change whatever you want to call it. Humans have an impact on the system and it is just a question of how much.
View attachment 942125
The yellow dots are the ones since the model was published.
It is not in our interest to admit responsibility when it could cost us money now and in the future. We love to argue. It isn't going to change no matter how much we stick our heads in the sand.
...AND, as we all know, MAN is not to be trusted...Models are not observed science. They are predictions made by......
Wait for it......
MAN.
I doubt that we will have much of an effect on the planet when our time is over and the next species takes over.
Go hold your breath, it'll happen!Cockroaches and MoPar sixes...
Still waiting for that observed science.
absolutely right and i apologize for not making the distinction.That wasn't the question.
I want proof-from an observed scientific experiment-that proves Man is causing global warming or climate change.